Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFE] More restock categories #6023

Open
3 tasks done
BTSS88 opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
3 tasks done

[RFE] More restock categories #6023

BTSS88 opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
(RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations

Comments

@BTSS88
Copy link

BTSS88 commented Feb 11, 2025

Enhancement Type *

Improvement to Existing Feature

Brief Description of Enhancement *

I find AutoLogistic's [Other Restock Percent] category too broad. I'd like MekHQ to keep track of actuator level for example but [Other] also includes fusion engines etc which are both very expensive and a waste of money to restock. An extra actuator category would really make things simpler.

Use Cases or Rationale

Having an actuator category would reduce a lot of micromanagement.

Every mech uses 4 actuators and with the number of mechs a campaign can accumulate, it's a far larger list to go over line by line than say JJs. It's also a body part that needs replacing more than any other component so automate restocking them would save a great deal of time for players.

Attach Files

No response

MekHQ Suite Version *

50.03

Final Verification

  • I confirm this request hasn't already been submitted (checked the tracker)
  • I've discussed or asked about this enhancement on MegaMek Discord
  • I’m opening this on the correct repo (MegaMek, MegaMekLab, or MekHQ)
@BTSS88 BTSS88 added the (RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations label Feb 11, 2025
@Tempest-56
Copy link

This would also hopefully lead to more consistency in what's in what category - IE normal SRMs and inferno SRMs count as 'ammo' but heat-seeking or anti-TSM count as 'other.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
(RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants