Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Roll to sf? #5

Closed
MikkoVihtakari opened this issue May 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Roll to sf? #5

MikkoVihtakari opened this issue May 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@MikkoVihtakari
Copy link
Owner

The ggOceanMaps package is currently written mostly using the sp package. This is because when I started writing the processor, PlotSvalbard, sp was the spatial package for R. Things have changed with the PROJ6 shift and nowadays sf appears superior to sp. Shift to sf would require rewriting most of ggOceanMaps code and make it not compatible with current ggOceanMapsData files. It would however improve stability, reduce the shapefile file size, make code easier to debug, make ggOceanMaps more flexible and work better with coord_sf(), and perhaps even make plotting the maps quicker.

I, however, do not have time to do this work alone. Would there be someone interested in participating in the development of ggOceanMaps? Any thoughts about the shift to sf?

@MikkoVihtakari
Copy link
Owner Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant