You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should break the three null model algos out as separate functions rather than just nestled within the get_delta_stats function. My reasons are 1) it will be easier to write a function for generating the null results for rarefied S only and not delta S which will need the same shuffling algos, 2) it makes it easier for other scientists to jump right to the important part (the null algos) and see how they work in a simple transparent way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Totally agreed. But the structural changes are probably not trivial, so I'm inclined to postpone it until we are sure that the function in its current setting is running properly. What do you think?
We should break the three null model algos out as separate functions rather than just nestled within the
get_delta_stats
function. My reasons are 1) it will be easier to write a function for generating the null results for rarefied S only and not delta S which will need the same shuffling algos, 2) it makes it easier for other scientists to jump right to the important part (the null algos) and see how they work in a simple transparent way.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: