-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Population page - state other than Susc shows X #892
Comments
A best case on this might be to have more than one icon. For example, if I wanted to build a population for endemic disease, I would start most of the units in immune (vx or natural). That would be useful to see as a distinct state. @lkholmstrom do you have any images that might help us understand this better? |
This would be relatively easy with the right icons. If you want me to make some icons I would be more than happy to give a shot at it. Otherwise non-infected units definitely should not be showing as a red X on the map, I should be able to render them as a regular dot fairly easy if you want to do a small patch on the bug portion of this ticket. Estimates: |
Just to clarify, all units that are not susceptible show as X - this may be any disease state, or any immune state. |
To clarify again - most disease states should have an X, (so that is L, B, C ) but S, V, D and N should not. On the Noun project, I found an icon that I like for V,D,N if it will allow color to show through. Still not sure if I want to commit 5 hours to it. |
Not sure I want to stick to that estimate - it was almost a year ago. Then again, I haven't really looked at the Population map since. |
This is minor, but odd.
Any state other than susceptible shows an X (like infected). There are states like nat immune, vaccine immune and destroyed where that would be weird.
We can fix when we have time.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: