Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to spack-stack 1.6.0 for running in global-workflow #117

Closed
DavidHuber-NOAA opened this issue Jan 3, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@DavidHuber-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

DavidHuber-NOAA commented Jan 3, 2024

EMC_Verif-Global should be upgraded to use the newest suite of spack-stack libraries (version 1.6.0). This includes an upgrade of netcdf-fortran to 4.6.1, prod_util to 2.1.1, and Python to 3.11.6. This should resolve at least some of the issues seen in the global-workflow.

@malloryprow
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks! The module loading will take place within the global-workflow, but I know a few places things will need to be update in EMC_verif-global to make sure we have things set up correctly.

@malloryprow malloryprow changed the title Upgrade to spack-stack 1.6.0 Upgrade to spack-stack 1.6.0 for running in global-workflow Jan 11, 2024
@malloryprow
Copy link
Collaborator

Changing issue name from "Upgrade to spack-stack 1.6.0" to "Upgrade to spack-stack 1.6.0 for running in global-workflow".

spack-stack v1.6.0 gsi-addon-dev has the need python, MET, and METplus versions needed to run EMC_verif-global for generating stats (which is what runs in the global-workflow)

Plots needs matplotlib and cartopy which are currently only in unified-env, and unified-env has the wrong versions of MET, METplus, and python that are needed, so plots cannot be generated using spack-stack v1.6.0.

EMC_verif-global standalone will update to using the spack-stack modules in the next spack-stack release (June-July timeframe), but the work to using the spack-stack module within the global-workflow can proceed.

@malloryprow malloryprow self-assigned this Jan 11, 2024
@malloryprow
Copy link
Collaborator

Noting, that the completion of this work will allow #92 to be closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants