Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modeling one DOAS to serve multiple AHUs #6529

Closed
aaron-boranian opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Modeling one DOAS to serve multiple AHUs #6529

aaron-boranian opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
InProgress Changes to address this feature request have been started MigratedFromUserVoice Feature request was migrated from uservoice website NewFeatureRequest This "issue" is a new feature request, not a defect report

Comments

@aaron-boranian
Copy link
Contributor

This feature develops the modeling and simulation approach for a dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS) connected to multiple air handling units (AHUs). Many buildings have a separate DOAS system that feeds outdoor air directly to individual AHUs on each building floor. Currently EnergyPlus can only model a DOAS delivering outdoor air directly to zones or to the inlet or outlet of some zone equipment acting as terminal units. This feature will allow a single DOAS to supply air to the outdoor air inlet of multiple air systems.

Migrated from UserVoice

NOTE: This could be related to PR #6248 and #5921 that allow multiple air systems to serve one zone.

@aaron-boranian aaron-boranian added the NewFeature Includes code to add a new feature to EnergyPlus label Mar 14, 2018
@FredWorter
Copy link

While this may be "related to" those other modifications, it is really about allowing DOAS AHUs to provide preconditioned air to OA node of multiple large AHUs, which themselves serve multiple zones. At times, said DOAS may also provide air directly to some zones.

@eringold
Copy link

More related to PR #6025.

Really curious why that seems to have died...

@MatthewSteen
Copy link
Member

@eringold I recall hearing that the people working on it changed jobs/retired.

@jasondegraw jasondegraw added MigratedFromUserVoice Feature request was migrated from uservoice website NewFeatureRequest This "issue" is a new feature request, not a defect report and removed NewFeature Includes code to add a new feature to EnergyPlus labels Apr 6, 2018
@jasondegraw jasondegraw added the InProgress Changes to address this feature request have been started label Jul 3, 2019
@jasondegraw
Copy link
Member

Being worked on in #7230

@shorowit
Copy link
Contributor

Completed in #7230.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
InProgress Changes to address this feature request have been started MigratedFromUserVoice Feature request was migrated from uservoice website NewFeatureRequest This "issue" is a new feature request, not a defect report
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants