You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In other performance models using measured data (not rdtools), I have found that that filtering out periods where sun elevation is less than 10 to 20 degrees above the horizon can be helpful, as it reduces periods with row-to-row shading and near object/horizon shading of modules or pyranometers. This is in addition to a POA filter.
Based on a few very quick tests with rdtools, I see a slight reduction in uncertainty when adding this as a filter.
Would adding this as a default or option be worthwhile?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In other performance models using measured data (not rdtools), I have found that that filtering out periods where sun elevation is less than 10 to 20 degrees above the horizon can be helpful, as it reduces periods with row-to-row shading and near object/horizon shading of modules or pyranometers. This is in addition to a POA filter.
Based on a few very quick tests with rdtools, I see a slight reduction in uncertainty when adding this as a filter.
Would adding this as a default or option be worthwhile?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: