Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore invalid version ranges in the v3 feed #4661

Closed
scottbommarito opened this issue Feb 21, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Ignore invalid version ranges in the v3 feed #4661

scottbommarito opened this issue Feb 21, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
Area:HttpCommunication Icebox cleanup candidate Priority:3 Issues under consideration. With enough upvotes, will be reconsidered to be added to the backlog. Status:Inactive Icebox issues not updated for a specific long time
Milestone

Comments

@scottbommarito
Copy link

Related to NuGet/NuGetGallery#3482

Currently, if the client tries to install a packages from the v3 feed with a dependency containing an invalid version range, it will fail. This is inconsistent with the behavior for v2, which is to simply install the oldest package. Because deleting old, broken packages from the gallery would upset users, and because we cannot guarantee that all feeds following the v3 protocol will implement it perfectly, we should abide by our v2 behavior and warn the user that the package has an issue but install the package anyway.

@emgarten emgarten added this to the Backlog milestone Nov 9, 2017
@emgarten emgarten added Priority:3 Issues under consideration. With enough upvotes, will be reconsidered to be added to the backlog. Area:HttpCommunication labels Nov 9, 2017
@ghost ghost added the Status:Inactive Icebox issues not updated for a specific long time label Sep 1, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 18, 2022

Due to lack of recent activity, this issue has been marked as a candidate for icebox cleanup. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 14 more days. Any new comment (by anyone, not necessarily the author) will add a Triage:NeedsTriageDiscussion label and lead to a triaging process.
This process is part of the experimental Stale icebox issues cleanup we are currently trialing. Please share any feedback you might have in the linked issue.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 2, 2022

This issue will now be closed since it had been marked Icebox cleanup candidate, but received no further activity in the past 14 days.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Dec 2, 2022
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area:HttpCommunication Icebox cleanup candidate Priority:3 Issues under consideration. With enough upvotes, will be reconsidered to be added to the backlog. Status:Inactive Icebox issues not updated for a specific long time
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants