Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Annotating dense data formats used in energy systems analysis #147

Open
1 task
areleu opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task

Annotating dense data formats used in energy systems analysis #147

areleu opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
other: help wanted 🙋 Extra attention is needed part: backend 🧱 Backend component priority: low 🦥 Low priority type: question ❓ Further information is requested

Comments

@areleu
Copy link

areleu commented Jul 8, 2024

Description of the issue

It would be nice to have an indication on how to go about dense data formats such as:

Most of them have a combination of tabular data format ordered in some structure, they all have apis that requiere special libraries to open but are to some degree integrated in some development environments.

Ideas of solution

I think we should consider including options in the json schema to add descriptors of these types of data, it might be necessary to add a new field that describes the library recommended to open the file (or at least refer to the specification of the file)

In cases such as NetCDF, one could also argue to include the whole oemetadata as part of the distributed files. But this offers edge cases where datasets consist of multiple netcdf can be tricky to annotate.

Workflow checklist

@areleu areleu added the type: enhancement ⚙️ Improvement of an existing feature label Jul 8, 2024
@jh-RLI jh-RLI moved this to To do in OEMetadata v2.0 Jul 16, 2024
@Ludee Ludee removed this from OEMetadata v2.0 Oct 8, 2024
@Ludee Ludee added other: help wanted 🙋 Extra attention is needed type: question ❓ Further information is requested priority: low 🦥 Low priority part: backend 🧱 Backend component and removed type: enhancement ⚙️ Improvement of an existing feature labels Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
other: help wanted 🙋 Extra attention is needed part: backend 🧱 Backend component priority: low 🦥 Low priority type: question ❓ Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants