Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

April 2018 Shipment for biological activity evaluation to Dundee #39

Open
maratsydney opened this issue Apr 24, 2018 · 61 comments
Open

Comments

@maratsydney
Copy link

maratsydney commented Apr 24, 2018

Update 25/7/18: Second run data has been received - link

OSM group in Sydney decided that there is no better way to celebrate Malaria day than send new batch of compounds for evaluation! Who knows, maybe the key molecule for the victory over Malaria now sitting in queue for the plane to UK.

The second batch of compounds for year (shown below) have now been shipped to Dundee for screening against P. falciparum.



MMV Number SMILES InChI InChI Key
MMV025100 NC1=C2C(C=C(C3=CC(S(N)(=O)=O)=CC=C3)S2)=NC=N1 InChI=1S/C12H10N4O2S2/c13-12-11-9(15-6-16-12)5-10(19-11)7-2-1-3-8(4-7)20(14,17)18/h1-6H,(H2,13,15,16)(H2,14,17,18) MQMXDJVOZKMSNT-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580421 FC(F)OC(C=C1)=CC=C1C2=NN=C3C=NC=C(OCC(CO)C4=CC=CC(OCC5=CC=CC=C5)=C4)N32 InChI=1S/C28H24F2N4O4/c29-28(30)38-23-11-9-20(10-12-23)27-33-32-25-14-31-15-26(34(25)27)37-18-22(16-35)21-7-4-8-24(13-21)36-17-19-5-2-1-3-6-19/h1-15,22,28,35H,16-18H2 MNCMMCAPVFCUDR-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580422 FC(F)OC(C=C1)=CC=C1C2=NN=C3C=NC=C(OCC(CO)C4=CC=CC(O)=C4)N32 InChI=1S/C21H18F2N4O4/c22-21(23)31-17-6-4-13(5-7-17)20-26-25-18-9-24-10-19(27(18)20)30-12-15(11-28)14-2-1-3-16(29)8-14/h1-10,15,21,28-29H,11-12H2 OKGRHDYGIKFDNY-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580423 FC(F)OC(C=C1)=CC=C1C2=NN=C3C=NC=C(OCC@HCC4=CC=CC=C4)N32 InChI=1S/C26H27F2N5O4/c1-26(2,3)37-25(34)30-19(13-17-7-5-4-6-8-17)16-35-22-15-29-14-21-31-32-23(33(21)22)18-9-11-20(12-10-18)36-24(27)28/h4-12,14-15,19,24H,13,16H2,1-3H3,(H,30,34) SDPYEXOSVNFLTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580424 FC(F)OC(C=C1)=CC=C1C2=NN=C3C=NC=C(OCC@HCC4=CC=CC=C4)N32 InChI=1S/C21H19F2N5O2/c22-21(23)30-17-8-6-15(7-9-17)20-27-26-18-11-25-12-19(28(18)20)29-13-16(24)10-14-4-2-1-3-5-14/h1-9,11-12,16,21H,10,13,24H2/t16-/m1/s1 FXPPGJNSMWQGRD-MRXNPFEDSA-N
MMV1580425 FC(F)OC(C=C1)=CC=C1C2=NN=C3C=NC=C(OCC@@HCC4=CC=CC=C4)N32 InChI=1S/C26H27F2N5O4/c1-26(2,3)37-25(34)30-19(13-17-7-5-4-6-8-17)16-35-22-15-29-14-21-31-32-23(33(21)22)18-9-11-20(12-10-18)36-24(27)28/h4-12,14-15,19,24H,13,16H2,1-3H3,(H,30,34) SDPYEXOSVNFLTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580426 FC(F)OC(C=C1)=CC=C1C2=NN=C3C=NC=C(OCC@@HCC4=CC=CC=C4)N32 InChI=1S/C21H19F2N5O2/c22-21(23)30-17-8-6-15(7-9-17)20-27-26-18-11-25-12-19(28(18)20)29-13-16(24)10-14-4-2-1-3-5-14/h1-9,11-12,16,21H,10,13,24H2/t16-/m0/s1 FXPPGJNSMWQGRD-INIZCTEOSA-N
MMV1580427 FC1=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(N4C=CC=N4)N32)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C16H12F2N6O/c17-12-3-2-11(8-13(12)18)4-7-25-15-10-19-9-14-21-22-16(24(14)15)23-6-1-5-20-23/h1-3,5-6,8-10H,4,7H2 ACHYQCFQKMAIMF-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580428 FC1=CC(CCOC2=NN=C3C=NC=C(N4C=CC=N4)N32)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C16H12F2N6O/c17-12-3-2-11(8-13(12)18)4-7-25-16-22-21-14-9-19-10-15(24(14)16)23-6-1-5-20-23/h1-3,5-6,8-10H,4,7H2 NTTWNFXYVLPPAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580429 FC(C=C1)=C(F)C=C1CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(OC4=CC=C(Cl)C=C4)N32 InChI=1S/C19H13ClF2N4O2/c20-13-2-4-14(5-3-13)28-19-25-24-17-10-23-11-18(26(17)19)27-8-7-12-1-6-15(21)16(22)9-12/h1-6,9-11H,7-8H2 ZAKLZMUOIOUUEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580430 FC1=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4=CC(N(C)C)=CC=C4)N32)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C21H19F2N5O/c1-27(2)16-5-3-4-15(11-16)21-26-25-19-12-24-13-20(28(19)21)29-9-8-14-6-7-17(22)18(23)10-14/h3-7,10-13H,8-9H2,1-2H3 CHKSIGXRRUITRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580431 FC1=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4=CC=C5C(NN=C5)=C4)N32)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C20H14F2N6O/c21-15-4-1-12(7-16(15)22)5-6-29-19-11-23-10-18-26-27-20(28(18)19)13-2-3-14-9-24-25-17(14)8-13/h1-4,7-11H,5-6H2,(H,24,25) CGVAIQJJRYJQMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580432 FC1=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4=C5C(NC=C5)=CC=C4)N23)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C21H15F2N5O/c22-16-5-4-13(10-17(16)23)7-9-29-20-12-24-11-19-26-27-21(28(19)20)15-2-1-3-18-14(15)6-8-25-18/h1-6,8,10-12,25H,7,9H2 BAKHABOPVVJMJZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580433 FC1=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4=CC=C(Cl)C(N)=C4)N32)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C19H14ClF2N5O/c20-13-3-2-12(8-16(13)23)19-26-25-17-9-24-10-18(27(17)19)28-6-5-11-1-4-14(21)15(22)7-11/h1-4,7-10H,5-6,23H2 UUAZLIWHOSTWRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580434 FC1=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4=CC=CC(N)=C4)N32)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C19H15F2N5O/c20-15-5-4-12(8-16(15)21)6-7-27-18-11-23-10-17-24-25-19(26(17)18)13-2-1-3-14(22)9-13/h1-5,8-11H,6-7,22H2 CQZOPOXKTPBXOH-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580435 FC1=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4=CC=C(CC)C=C4)N23)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C21H18F2N4O/c1-2-14-3-6-16(7-4-14)21-26-25-19-12-24-13-20(27(19)21)28-10-9-15-5-8-17(22)18(23)11-15/h3-8,11-13H,2,9-10H2,1H3 GYRZMHSUHLZDJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580436 FC1=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4=CC=C(C(O)=O)C=C4)N32)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C20H14F2N4O3/c21-15-6-1-12(9-16(15)22)7-8-29-18-11-23-10-17-24-25-19(26(17)18)13-2-4-14(5-3-13)20(27)28/h1-6,9-11H,7-8H2,(H,27,28) UMTJNRMURJHRAT-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580437 FC1=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4=CC=CC(C(O)=O)=C4)N32)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C20H14F2N4O3/c21-15-5-4-12(8-16(15)22)6-7-29-18-11-23-10-17-24-25-19(26(17)18)13-2-1-3-14(9-13)20(27)28/h1-5,8-11H,6-7H2,(H,27,28) GYFXXYGBOJTVGJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580438 FC1=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4=CC=C(N+=O)C=C4)N32)=CC=C1F InChI=1S/C19H13F2N5O3/c20-15-6-1-12(9-16(15)21)7-8-29-18-11-22-10-17-23-24-19(25(17)18)13-2-4-14(5-3-13)26(27)28/h1-6,9-11H,7-8H2 ANXKNNLWLQBISN-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580441 OC(C1=CC=CC=C1)COC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4CNCCC4)N32 InChI=1S/C18H21N5O2/c24-15(13-5-2-1-3-6-13)12-25-17-11-20-10-16-21-22-18(23(16)17)14-7-4-8-19-9-14/h1-3,5-6,10-11,14-15,19,24H,4,7-9,12H2 SNDLBGDEOQPBOQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580442 FC1=C(F)C=CC(CCOC2=CN=CC3=NN=C(C4CNCCC4)N32)=C1 InChI=1S/C18H19F2N5O/c19-14-4-3-12(8-15(14)20)5-7-26-17-11-22-10-16-23-24-18(25(16)17)13-2-1-6-21-9-13/h3-4,8,10-11,13,21H,1-2,5-7,9H2 DRTAQDBSMNPECX-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580315 FC(F)OC(C=C1)=CC=C1C2=NN=C3C=NC=C(OCC(CO)(O)C4=CC=CC=C4)N32 InChI=1S/C21H18F2N4O4/c22-20(23)31-16-8-6-14(7-9-16)19-26-25-17-10-24-11-18(27(17)19)30-13-21(29,12-28)15-4-2-1-3-5-15/h1-11,20,28-29H,12-13H2 LVBNVRWXODMMAV-UHFFFAOYSA-N
MMV1580439 OCC(COC1=CN=CC2=NN=C(C3=CC=C4C(NC=C4)=C3)N21)C5=CC=CC=C5 InChI=1S/C22H19N5O2/c28-13-18(15-4-2-1-3-5-15)14-29-21-12-23-11-20-25-26-22(27(20)21)17-7-6-16-8-9-24-19(16)10-17/h1-12,18,24,28H,13-14H2 XPFWGOXNOABZNA-UHFFFAOYSA-N

2018.04.24 Dundee.cdx.zip

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

I think i found a mistake in the dataset? @maratsydney
39183900-e9bb001a-4804-11e8-9c09-70a238688644

@maratsydney
Copy link
Author

maratsydney commented Apr 25, 2018

It is indeed unusual, I was aiming for the MK031-2a but apart from it isolated another product and with help of NMR was able to assign structure shown as MK031-2b. ELN entry mk031-2 github

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented Apr 25, 2018

Perhaps you had a mirrored impurity in your halogenated precursor? Any idea where it came from?

@maratsydney
Copy link
Author

@MFernflower I am sure that SM was pure and it's hard to imagine to have that mirrored precursor from the synthetic route that I was following to make it. *edited previous comment to add ELN entry

@mattodd
Copy link
Member

mattodd commented Apr 25, 2018

It's a super-interesting compound @maratsydney has carefully isolated. At the moment we can only think that this implies some lability in the ether substituent. i.e. That it can, under certain conditions, be displaced and can then re-attach. But it needs more investigating if we're going to understand it. @mcoster

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented Apr 25, 2018

@maratsydney Do you see any product where t-BuOH has displaced the Br?

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented Apr 25, 2018

Hmm, interesting... Are you able to share the NMR data - what evidence shows that it is this particular regioisomer? @maratsydney

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented Apr 25, 2018

Could it be?
idea

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented Apr 25, 2018

My thoughts exactly, @drc007 - it's easier to imagine a small amount of regioisomeric heteroaryl bromide escaping attention, than imagine a reasonable mechanism for the "mirrored" compound.

If that phenethyl alcohol group were to depart, I would be leaning towards aryne type intermediates, but even then, why would that be regioselectively trapped back on the same carbon by pyrazole anion, and the bromide selectively displaced by the small amount of that alkoxide?

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented Apr 25, 2018

@mcoster @maratsydney Might be difficult to distinguish by NMR?

Is it a solid? Small molecule crystal structure.

@maratsydney
Copy link
Author

maratsydney commented Apr 25, 2018

@drc007, @mcoster definitely crystal will be the best option. Now after you mentioned that isomer that I didn't consider before I got confused a bit again (need to look back at all NMR), but one of the non-direct evidences for proposed structure is coupling of protons on main heterocycle which appear when I nave nitrogen in north-west position (and J value is quite big 4-5 Hz) while in all other compounds these signals sharp singlets. And I imagine in proposed structure coupling between protons of main heterocycle looks impossible (just too far away from each other). See all the spectra for two compounds in attachment in MestreNova format.

And talking about source of alcohol: when I was doing Buchwald-Hartwig reaction on the very same substrate I was able to get product with difluorophenylethanol sitting on both position, what suggest release of alcohol from degradation of the core at basic conditions. Later on I set up reaction with sodium tertbutoxide and difluorophenylethanol to verify that theory and it was successful. And one more comment on purity of starting material: I isolated about 7% of that isomer from reaction so it should be about the same amount of impurity in the SM but I don't see any additional peaks in NMR and on top of that SM was recrystallized after column.

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented Apr 25, 2018

MK031-2a: 9.1 ppm seems quite far downfield for a pyrazine 1H signal - have you seen them this far downfield in other compounds?

@maratsydney
Copy link
Author

maratsydney commented Apr 25, 2018

@mcoster Just checked that for starting material (with bromine on the RHS) it's 8.9 ppm, for compound with naked phenyl ring - 9.0 ppm, with 4-nitrophenyl 9.1.
@drc007 I isolated only these two product in reasonable amounts, I have seen some very weak response of other compounds during the run of the column, but it would be less than mg quantity - so I didn't try to analyze it.

@mattodd
Copy link
Member

mattodd commented Apr 25, 2018

Interesting discussion and ideas here. @maratsydney I wonder if you can lay out the case (i.e. give us a pic of the NMR spectrum) for why we do not have the isomeric bromide present at the start of the displacement reaction. There is this issue of why sometimes we have singlets and sometimes doublets for the two protons attached to the pyrazine ring, but I'm pretty sure that's not related.

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented Apr 26, 2018

@maratsydney - thanks for uploading the NMRs! I spent some time this morning poring over them, and I agree with you that it seems to be the transposed isomer, although a crystal structure would be fantastic. What a surprising result! It's interesting that no compound with pyrazole in both north-west and north-east is isolated. I wonder whether this chemistry could be optimised and then exploited to access analogues that are otherwise difficult to prepare?..

@maratsydney
Copy link
Author

@mcoster thank you for spending time on NMR, always good to know that more experienced people support the same version. I am currently working towards getting crystals. And just to close that important point about the purity I attached NMR of that batch used in reaction.

@mattodd good point that you mentioned about these doublets that we see sometimes. I will try to organize it nicely and will open another issue to ask about that interesting case, since all my attempts to find the answer were unsuccessful so far.
MK005-14.zip
MK005-14.pdf

@maratsydney
Copy link
Author

maratsydney commented May 22, 2018

Short but very important update:
I received results from x-ray analysis of mentioned above compounds and the structure for suggested MK031-2b proved to be wrong. Here is the reaction scheme with products+xray structures that explain H NMR perfectly but completely unexpected in terms of chemistry:
2018 05 22 - mk031-2 xray

Apart from it I have got results of other x-ray samples that have doublets and they found to be connected the same way at the bottom of the core at position 8. Example below (NMR attached):

mk026-2 scheme
MK026-2.zip
After these news were revealed I looked at compounds that were made in the project so far and found that some of them have same characteristic doublets an in previous examples. Now were are trying to run more experiments to get clarity on this unexpected chemistry.
And the last point that triazolopyrazine with OH attached to it that was recovered as a side product by @david1597 has triazolopyrazine protons as doublets as well, that strongly suggest that actual position is 8 rather than 5. So please take this into consideration @Plebellec @CamilleHauguel @mcoster

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented May 22, 2018

@maratsydney Looks like a nice short publication there ;-)

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented May 22, 2018

Well now, that's interesting! Great work @maratsydney

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented May 22, 2018

So do you think the displacement at the 8-position occurred when you introduced the difluorophenylethanol or as you have drawn it in the reaction above there was a rearrangement from the 5-positon to the 8-position when you introduced the pyrrazole?

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented May 22, 2018

I wonder if the 8 position compound precursor (Let's just call it 8X) was formed during a rxn involving a reactive halogen (Marat's NBS experiments or during the production of the TP core as that requires use of iodanes - considering @david1597 might have made some 8X on accident) @mattodd @mcoster @MedChemProf

ICP-OES would pickup if there is any iodine containing impurities in freshly cyclized TP core - but it's a destructive process and will only pickup iodine containing impurities as Cl and F exist on freshly made core

@mattodd
Copy link
Member

mattodd commented May 22, 2018

It's a fascinating and important result. Three things:

  1. @maratsydney has a spreadsheet of instances he'll share where the doublets are seen, which suggest attachment at the 8- position. They are uniformly biologically inactive. These data may require structural revision of several compounds (annoying) but also may help explain why some minor structural changes resulted in inactivity, re-opening some SAR we thought we'd explored.

  2. The most likely explanation is that the chlorine was in the 8-position all along. @maratsydney is double-checking this by looking back at data on the chlorinated precursors that were used. At the moment this analysis is suggesting that the chlorine was not in the 8-position, but was where we expected it to be.

  3. If that's the case, and the chlorine was in the right place in the precursor (and there was, for example, no impurity of a compound with the chlorine in the 8-position) then we are left to explain how a migration, or some other rearrangement, could possibly have happened. Such a reaction would require not just the migration of the chain, but also the migration of the H. At the moment, Marat's analysis suggests that we see these products when the added nucleophile is nucleophilic at N or S, rather than O. An experiment to be performed, therefore, is to use one batch of chlorinated precursor in three reactions that are identical apart from the addition of i) an alcohol, ii) an analogous amine and iii) an analogous thiol.

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented May 23, 2018

Here are my thoughts on a plausible mechanism for formation of the unusual regioisomer, if it turns out to not be from a contaminant in the starting materials:

unusual-regioisomer_snar

In the expected reaction pathway, the nucleophile attacks the ipso carbon, bearing the leaving group. With some nucleophiles, perhaps based on hard-soft properties, pKa's, reversibility, proton sources, phase of the moon ;) - attack para to the chlorine could give a Meisenheimer complex that is protonated, then deprotonated at a different position to give a new Meisenheimer complex, which loses chloride to give the unexpected regioisomer.

(Notes: there are lots of resonance forms that could be drawn for the Meisenheimer complex, and where proton transfers occur, it is reasonable to invoke the nucleophile, ie. hydroxide/water, amine/ammonium salt, etc.)

@maratsydney @david1597 @mattodd @Plebellec @CamilleHauguel

Edit: at'ed relevant people

@mattodd
Copy link
Member

mattodd commented May 23, 2018

Nice mechanism, @mcoster . I don't like the look of the carbanion (2nd structure, para addition) but that's a gut feeling rather than a rational one. Only one obvious resonance form without redrawing something exotic for the triazole ring. The final elimination could occur directly, right, without disturbing the aromaticity of the triazole.

I'd have thought the ipso attack would be favoured by hard Nu, since the Cl will make the carbon more electron deficient than the para position, which would be attacked by softer Nu. That's what we're seeing I think, but early days.

An experiment we talked about today is the control reaction without added nucleophile. Add to the list...

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented May 23, 2018

I guess in the first step you park the anion on N7 then pick up the hydrogen at C5 to get to the same intermediate? Followed by simple elimination not involving triazole.

You could also take MK031-2a and resubject to reaction conditions to see if MK031-2b is formed?

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented May 23, 2018

Yes, N7 anion will certainly be major resonance contributor

@david1597
Copy link
Contributor

david1597 commented May 30, 2018

Potency data for the first run of the April batch has been received:

24042018 dundee results

  • The original Suzuki hit (OSM-S-525) which was resynthesised has come back at 168 nM confirming good potency (86 nM average of two runs last time).
  • Others from the Suzuki series are also potent. A quick look seems to indicate that an NH meta, and something para gives the more potent compounds.
  • The 2-phenylpropan-1-ol compounds show some promise - potencies are in the low hundred nM.
  • Nemesis is inactive
  • Phenylalaninol compounds are pretty much inactive but show variation between enantiomers

Once we have data from the second run (usually 7 days wait) I will repost and then update the wiki/master list/ELN/GH etc. We're still waiting on the Series 3 result, and that of the Pfizer re-run that was sent separately.

Great to see two sets of potent compounds in this selection.

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented May 31, 2018

@david1597 @mattodd Wonderful! I guess this allows the green light to tinker even more with the 2-(3-subsitutedphenyl)propan-1-ol series

A few possible ideas: (edited to include last-min biphenyl and ring lock ideas based on the potency of OSM-S-532)

40753989-c206e5dc-6444-11e8-8279-5d08c9f47ca1

SMILES STRINGS: (X = S in tricyclic compound)
CN(C)C1=CC(=CC=C1)C(CO)COC1=CN=CC2=NN=C(N12)C1=CC=C(OC(F)F)C=C1 CC(=O)NC1=CC(=CC=C1)C(CO)COC1=CN=CC2=NN=C(N12)C1=CC=C(OC(F)F)C=C1 OCC(COC1=CN=CC2=NN=C(N12)C1=CC=C(OC(F)F)C=C1)C1=CC=CC(OC(F)(F)F)=C1 OCC(COC1=CN=CC2=NN=C(N12)C1=CC=C(OC(F)F)C=C1)C1=CC=CC(=C1)S(F)(F)(F)(F)F OCC(COC1=CN=CC2=NN=C(N12)C1=CC=C(OC(F)F)C=C1)C1=CC=CC=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 OCC(COC1=CN=CC2=NN=C(N12)C1=CC=C2C=CNC2=C1)C1=CC=CC(OCC2=CC=CC=C2)=C1 OCC(COC1=CN=CC2=NN=C(N12)C1=CC=C(OC(F)F)C=C1)C1=CC=CC2=C1C1=CC=CC=C1CS2

Very interesting that the P-ethyl compound was active

@maratsydney 4-tert-Butylphenylboronic acid is commercially available and so is 4-(Trimethylsilyl)phenylboronic acid *The precursor to my so-called 'firewalker' compound (bonus points if you get this reference)

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/523674?lang=en&region=AU - Firewalker
https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/480053?lang=en&region=AU - Tert butyl

@david1597
Copy link
Contributor

david1597 commented May 31, 2018

FYI, here are the compounds we plan to send in the next shipment (potentially in the next 1-2 weeks). It may answer some questions about what happens next, esp regarding the Suzuki series.

compounds for dundee

Edited to fix a missing double bond in one of the structures

@edwintse
Copy link
Contributor

@MFernflower It's usually a good idea to provide some rationale for your suggestions. It'll help when making decisions on what to synthesise next. (e.g. any particular reason for the tricyclic or biphenyl ideas?)

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented May 31, 2018

@edwintse @david1597 The idea behind the biphenyl was because of the potency of the benzyl protected molecule (OSM-S-532) and the tricyclic is simply a ring lock of OSM-S-532 (edited main post to add this information in)

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented May 31, 2018

How exciting! I would echo @MedChemProf 's suggestion in #49 that we need to keep our target compound profile in mind. There seem to be a number of recent structural changes that benefit potency, eg. benzylic OH, RHS indole/meta-aniline, meta-bezyloxy substituted LHS. However, we also need to keep in mind what these changes do to the ADME/DMPK properties. If we start a new issue in the near future to prioritise future directions, it would be really helpful to chart out the key structures, with not only the potency, but also cLogP and other key indicators. For example, the meta-benzyloxy LHS compund is interesting, but I presume it is higher logP, lower water solubility, etc? Might suggest priority should be given to exploration of the RHS indoles and indole isosteres.

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented May 31, 2018

@mcoster @mattodd I have been trying to come up with more polar (sub three clogp) compounds - Thoughts on these gentlemen?
swissadme
untitled

Phosphate prodrug of meta-hydroxyphenyl
polar

@mattodd
Copy link
Member

mattodd commented May 31, 2018

Agreed @mcoster - just commented in response to @MedChemProf at #49 (comment) The attractive aspect of the Pfizer and indole/meta-NH2 compounds is that the potency is achieved through the addition of polar groups. I've not calculated, but I'm assuming the cLogPs are good, and we need to maintain this trend for all future compounds here. @MedChemProf proposed benzylic amines, for example, are great and maintain the other polar groups. Also avoiding metabolically labile groups (or toxic) groups is then the remaining item on the checklist.

@david1597
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed @mcoster @MedChemProf @mattodd. I think we're at a good point to take a step back and look at the big picture of where we are, and where we need to be with respect to properties other than potency. Let's wait till we have the second run back from Dundee and then kick off that discussion in more detail.

@MFernflower With the 2-phenylpropan-1-ol series, this was the series I was heavily focused on earlier in the year but then paused as it became evident the original Pfizer hit was the OHOH compound and they became the priority. I still have some of these 2-phenylpropan-1-ol compounds to finish off (including anilines that can be acetylated) that are at varying stages of completeness, although it's unlikely I'll get this done within the next two weeks with the current focus on trying to get a 5-substituted amine.

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented May 31, 2018

@david1597 @mattodd Indeed - all focus should be put into the palladium coupling and other steps needed to get the 5-phenethylamino compound but I do feel at some point we should combine the things we have learned about the RHS and LHS into a single molecule (Addressing the rather polar elephant in the room so to speak)

elephant

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented May 31, 2018

One thing to bear in mind if the meta-amino substituted compounds are explored further - many anilines have nasty metabolites, including mutagenic properties. Here's a paper from AZ where they looked at getting rid of mutagenicity in aminobiphenyls (admittedly, the para-substituted ones, though). They have some interesting observations around putting a fluorine or chlorine meta to the amine, so it is also ortho- to the other aryl group - there's an interesting interplay between the inductive effect of the halogen and the conformational change around the biaryl bond.

The above, and looking at the 3D models we made at GU as trophies for undergrad prizes has me wondering about substitution at this position of the RHS substituent. I can't recall having seen this explored in the compounds tested previously? Changing the orientation of the RHS substituent relative to the triazolopyrazine core could have an interesting influence on the activity, particularly if there is a H-bonding group, eg. indoles, meta-amines.

biaryl-angle

@mattodd
Copy link
Member

mattodd commented May 31, 2018

Tolerated, for sure, but need something para.

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented May 31, 2018

A few thoughts. Some very interesting results but perhaps we need to get repeats before embarking on long syntheses ;-)
We should remember that as @mcoster has mentioned anilines have a well deserved reputation for being mutagenic. In addition chloroanilines are known to be hepatotoxic, and putative aromatic ring hydroxylation metabolites are often more toxic. If we plan to follow this lead up then it would be prudent to have a strategy in place to assess the potential toxicity risk.
I would suspect there is an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the NH2 and the ortho chlorine, so perhaps the "virtual ring" is is acting as a indole mimic? It might be interesting to replace the 4-chloro with 4-Methyl (or ethyl) to compare.
@david1597 The N-Methyl indole that is in the next batch could be very informative (I assume the lack of double bond in the structure is a typo?).
@mcoster I'd always assumed the aryl and triazolopyrazine groups were orthogonal in the low energy conformation but with relatively free rotation. If we introduce substituents (your X or Y) will we get atropisomers?

@mattodd
Copy link
Member

mattodd commented May 31, 2018

Yes indeed - we need to wait for the repeats from Dundee (usually 7 days) and the usual thing (hopefully this batch is the same, otherwise we'll chase) is to secure cytotox data on actives.

@david1597
Copy link
Contributor

@drc007 Typo. I've edited the original to fix it. Thanks

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented May 31, 2018

@drc007 that "virtual ring" idea is interesting - the fluoro analogue on @david1597 's list will be interesting.

Biphenyl itself has a 'twist angle' of about 45 degrees. If you put halogens in the 2 and 2' positions, it goes to ~ 60 (F) then to almost 90 degrees (Br and I).Ref Since the Series 4 compounds generally have no ortho substituent on the RHS aryl substituent, and the biaryl bond links to a 5-membered ring, where one of the adjacent atoms is a nitrogen, I wouldn't be surprised if the twist angle is less than 45 degrees.

I think atropisomers would be a possibility if we had two ortho substituents on the RHS aryl group, ie. X,Y ≠ H. But, I think if we had only one ortho subsituent (eg. X = Cl, Y = H), we would still have relatively free rotation with the X group going past the triazole nitrogen.

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented May 31, 2018 via email

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented Jun 4, 2018

@maratsydney Are the crystal structure files for MK031-2a available? Would be interesting to look at the angle between the rings. @mcoster

@MFernflower I think you mean benzofuran, might be interesting to compare a compound without an N-H but electron-rich heterocycles are often good substrates for CYP450 enzymes. Benzimidazole would also be interesting, as would the various azaindoles but some would require synthesis of the appropriate boronic acids.

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented Jun 4, 2018 via email

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented Jun 5, 2018

Please ignore the previous comment I made @maratsydney @drc007 @david1597 - I had erroneously thought the indole ring was linked to the TP core at posistion C5!!!! I was wrong - it's C6

Some relevant boronic acids linked at that position are commercially available:

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/708631?lang=en&region=AU

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/702188?lang=en&region=AU (benzimidazole precursor - this will need to be subjected to Miyaura Borylation) - See this paper for interesting variant of the reaction https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994125/

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/cds019261?lang=en&region=AU

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/cds024473?lang=en&region=AU

@maratsydney
Copy link
Author

@drc007, I posted all xray files that I have with the structures in #46.

@MFernflower benzimidazole is worth to try and I believe that two nitrogens in benzimidazole ring should be equivalent (and a real structure something average) - so it doesn't matter if it's position 5 or 6. This is my opinion, would love to hear confirmation.

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

That might be a question @mcoster can answer

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented Jun 5, 2018

I'm sure many can answer! They're tautomers and not quite equivalent, since one nitrogen is para- and one meta- to the attachment point, but I suspect they would be very similar in energy and rapidly interconverting, and hence shouldn't make much difference whether it is 5- or 6- position.

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

@mcoster Believe it or not I actually did not realize until you mentioned it that benzimidazole tautomerizes

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented Jun 7, 2018

@maratsydney alongside the benzimidazole I would be curious to see what the homologous quinoline compound would fair in terms of potency since it has no N-H bond

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/641618?lang=en&region=AU Once again this is pricey but still could be worth a try

Edit: I don't think the nitrogen atom of that boronic acid aligns with the N of the indole - Quinoxaline is a better match but is really pricey for the 6 boronic acid https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/708631?lang=en&region=AU

@david1597
Copy link
Contributor

Second run of data has been received and is these results are in a new issue - #56.

This issue must now be one of our longest in terms of number of comments! I'll try and tidy it up - separate out the various discussions into new issues if needed - and then this one can subsequently be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants