Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flight Issues for Q_estimator + LPE #8934

Closed
dronecrewkari opened this issue Feb 22, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Flight Issues for Q_estimator + LPE #8934

dronecrewkari opened this issue Feb 22, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dronecrewkari
Copy link

@priseborough @jgoppert

I had a flight today with Q_estimator + LPE today.

with optical flow and Lidar-Lite v3.
(Lidar-Lite v3 was automatically used for LPE)

Every parameter for Q_estimator + LPE was default parameter.

Previous flight with the same UAV for EKF2 was okay as following log indicates a few days ago

https://logs.px4.io/plot_app?log=3027489e-bfee-44b4-9dff-97ed295723b3

However, with Q_estimator + LPE today

I cannot control UAV even in Position Hold mode, so changed into RTL mode immediately.

Following log is based on Q_estimator + LPE.

https://logs.px4.io/plot_app?log=7b7a3db4-3549-46a5-ae63-76a5c918447c

It seems to me that yaw angle estimate was quite strange.

Here is the parameter file for LPE.

Flight_with_LPE.tar.gz

Would you please let me know what was the problem?

@dronecrewkari dronecrewkari changed the title Flight Issues Flight Issues for Q_estimator + LPE Feb 22, 2018
@priseborough priseborough assigned jgoppert and unassigned jgoppert Feb 23, 2018
@priseborough
Copy link
Contributor

@jgoppert are you able to handle this? I'm not familiar with the LPE code.

@TSC21
Copy link
Member

TSC21 commented Feb 23, 2018

@priseborough I will review this soon.

@TSC21 TSC21 self-assigned this Feb 23, 2018
@LorenzMeier
Copy link
Member

@dronecrewkari The LPE is not community supported, so I'm closing this. Ping us if you need support for it and we can point you at different consultants who might be able to offer support. We as a community can't ensure quality on all sorts of configurations and focus our attention on the officially supported components.

@TSC21
Copy link
Member

TSC21 commented Feb 25, 2018

@LorenzMeier I will take it from here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants