diff --git a/content/0005_en_optimized_bulk_creation_factory_boy.md b/content/0005_en_optimized_bulk_creation_factory_boy.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..db8f9c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/0005_en_optimized_bulk_creation_factory_boy.md
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+Title: Factory-Boy : Optimize bulk creation
+Date: 2024-09-12 16:42
+Id: 0005
+Slug: optimize-bulk-creation-factory_boy
+Lang: en
+Category: development
+Tags: django, tests
+Summary: Speed up large dataset creation in factory boy
+
+# The problem
+
+When creating large dataset using [factory_boy](https://pypi.org/project/factory-boy/), you may find yourself using [`MyFactory.create_batch()`](https://factoryboy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference.html#factory.create_batch) which is great for specifyng a size, but falls short in terms of performance when using factories based on Django models.
+
+Indeed, here's the related source code:
+```python
+    @classmethod
+    def create_batch(cls, size, **kwargs):
+        """Create a batch of instances of the given class, with overridden attrs.
+
+        Args:
+            size (int): the number of instances to create
+
+        Returns:
+            object list: the created instances
+        """
+        return [cls.create(**kwargs) for _ in range(size)]
+```
+
+This means that an instance is generated and created for each iteration, resulting in numerous SQL queries, especially if your factory uses `SubFactory` (related model factories).
+
+# The solution
+
+To prevent too much SQL queries, it would be better to use `bulk_create` from the Django manager.
+
+A simple solution can be to generate the instances and then saving them, you can also pass parameters (`notifications_enabled` for example):
+```python
+class ContactFactory(DjangoModelFactory):
+    class Meta:
+        model = Contact
+
+# Create a thousand contacts
+contact_list = ContactFactory.simple_generate_batch(
+    create=False, size=1000, notifications_enabled=True
+)
+contact_list = Contact.objects.bulk_create(contact_list)
+```
+
+But what if our factory has a `SubFactory`? You would certainly hit a N+1 problem. To overcome it, you may bulk create sequentially, while retaining primary keys:
+
+```python
+class ContactFactory(DjangoModelFactory):
+    class Meta:
+        model = Contact
+
+class NotificationFactory(DjangoModelFactory)
+    contact = factory.SubFactory(ContactFactory)
+
+    class Meta:
+        model = Notification
+
+size = 1000
+# Create contacts
+contact_list = ContactFactory.simple_generate_batch(
+    create=False, size=size, notifications_enabled=True
+)
+contact_list = Contact.objects.bulk_create(contact_list)
+
+# Create a notification for each contact
+obj_list = NotificationFactory.simple_generate_batch(
+    create=False, size=size, contact=None
+)
+for pos, obj in enumerate(obj_list):
+    obj.contact_id = contact_list[pos].pk
+Notification.objects.bulk_create(obj_list)
+```
diff --git a/content/0005_fr_optimized_bulk_creation_factory_boy.md b/content/0005_fr_optimized_bulk_creation_factory_boy.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..56ff72b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/0005_fr_optimized_bulk_creation_factory_boy.md
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+Title : Factory-Boy : Optimiser la création en masse
+Date : 2024-09-12 16:42
+Id : 0005
+Slug : optimiser-creation-en-masse-factory_boy
+Lang : fr
+Category : développement
+Tags : django, tests
+Summary : Accélérer la création de grands ensembles de données avec factory_boy
+
+
+# Le problème
+
+Lorsque vous créez de grands ensembles de données en utilisant [factory_boy](https://pypi.org/project/factory-boy/), vous pouvez vous retrouver à utiliser [`MyFactory.create_batch()`](https://factoryboy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference.html#factory.create_batch), ce qui est excellent pour spécifier la taille de la liste, mais est limité en termes de performance lorsqu'il s'agit de factory basées sur des modèles Django.
+
+En effet, voici le code source concerné :
+
+```python
+    @classmethod
+    def create_batch(cls, size, **kwargs):
+        """Create a batch of instances of the given class, with overridden attrs.
+
+        Args:
+            size (int): the number of instances to create
+
+        Returns:
+            object list: the created instances
+        """
+        return [cls.create(**kwargs) for _ in range(size)]
+```
+
+Cela signifie qu'une instance est générée et créée pour chaque itération, entraînant de nombreuses requêtes SQL, surtout si votre factory utilise `SubFactory` (lorsqu'un modèle est associé via une `ForeignKey`).
+
+# La solution
+
+Pour éviter trop de requêtes SQL, il serait préférable d'utiliser `bulk_create` depuis le manager Django.
+
+Une solution simple consiste à générer les instances puis à les sauvegarder. Vous pouvez également passer des paramètres (comme `notifications_enabled` par exemple) :
+
+```python
+class ContactFactory(DjangoModelFactory):
+    class Meta:
+        model = Contact
+
+# Créer mille contacts
+contact_list = ContactFactory.simple_generate_batch(
+    create=False, size=1000, notifications_enabled=True
+)
+contact_list = Contact.objects.bulk_create(contact_list)
+```
+
+Mais que faire si notre factory a une `SubFactory` ? Vous rencontrerez certainement un problème de N+1. Pour y remédier, vous pouvez créer en masse séquentiellement, en conservant les clés primaires :
+
+
+```python
+class ContactFactory(DjangoModelFactory):
+    class Meta:
+        model = Contact
+
+class NotificationFactory(DjangoModelFactory)
+    contact = factory.SubFactory(ContactFactory)
+
+    class Meta:
+        model = Notification
+
+size = 1000
+# Création des contacts
+contact_list = ContactFactory.simple_generate_batch(
+    create=False, size=size, notifications_enabled=True
+)
+contact_list = Contact.objects.bulk_create(contact_list)
+
+# Créer une notification pour chaque contact
+obj_list = NotificationFactory.simple_generate_batch(
+    create=False, size=size, contact=None
+)
+for pos, obj in enumerate(obj_list):
+    obj.contact_id = contact_list[pos].pk
+Notification.objects.bulk_create(obj_list)
+```
\ No newline at end of file