-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Documentation on how to use the Coregistration plugin in QGIS #9
Comments
Hi @dimplejaiin The Automated Local Co-Registration requires more adjustments in the options if you want optimal results, "local" here means that the process tries to co-registrate by segments (windows) of your input image. In general, I recommend "global" when your image presents a general shift (whole image) with respect to the reference image, and it also is simpler to setup respect to local option. This to co-registration option the plugin uses the Arosics tool for process the image, you can find more information Arosics, also here the expert about the differences of local and global is Daniel (@danschef) maybe he could explain in detail that. Regards |
Thank You for your response @XavierCLL Based on your suggestion, I used the global tool on two individual bands. However, I am experiencing difficulty interpreting the output as it appears that the reference image and output image are not properly coregistered. Additionally, the output image contains a significant amount of no data pixels. I am wondering if these can be utilised as tie points and, if so, would greatly appreciate your guidance on how to proceed. Thank You! |
@dimplejaiin This sounds like an issue which is only related to your specific input data and not to the implementation of the QGIS plugin itself. I recommend to open an issue here including additional information about how you called AROSICS and probably screenshots from your input images. |
Hi @danschef Sure, and Thanks for your response. |
@XavierCLL @jakimowb I have tested the plugin in QGIS version 3.28.4-Firenze using the Automated Local Co-Registration tool and received an output. However, I am having difficulty interpreting the output and it seems that the output is not properly coregistered with the target image. It would be greatly appreciated if documentation or guidelines could be provided to assist with using the plugin and interpreting the results.
Thank You!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: