You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Similar to how Inf bounds are handled, we should handle this case by an automatic transformation.
Particularly because the Inf bound handling implicitly assumes that lb < ub, and integrals from +inf to a might give incorrect results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm pretty sure that's not supported for a reason, while I couldn't found cases where the lower bound is higher then the higher bound. I guess that's just isn't needed (meaning for infinite positive lower bound).
Similar to how
Inf
bounds are handled, we should handle this case by an automatic transformation.Particularly because the
Inf
bound handling implicitly assumes thatlb < ub
, and integrals from+inf
toa
might give incorrect results.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: