Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

weaving produces errors in 08-spiking_neural_systems.jmd #325

Closed
danielmk opened this issue Sep 18, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

weaving produces errors in 08-spiking_neural_systems.jmd #325

danielmk opened this issue Sep 18, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@danielmk
Copy link
Contributor

I realized that Weave.jl produced errors on #322 in 08-spiking_neural_system.jmd which I cannot track down. When I run the .ipynb in my Jupyter no errors occur but the weave just doesn't work on my end. Any ideas? I'm not very experienced with Weave.jl

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

The issue is DataStructures v0.18. We need to dig in and find out the versioning issue for the Models.

@devmotion just in case you know what in https://github.com/SciML/SciMLTutorials.jl/blob/master/tutorials/models/Project.toml might be problematic.

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

DiffEqBiological is the culprit: version 4.3 is only compatible with DataStructures 0.17 (https://github.com/SciML/Catalyst.jl/blob/cdd9606070250a0e571d0a80f26d5458ba4d460d/Project.toml#L23) and the compat section does not allow Catalyst >= 5

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

Another problem is NeuralNetDiffEq 1.6 which depends on CuArrays which in turn only supports DataStructures 0.17. This could be fixed by updating to NeuralPDE >= 2 + CUDA.

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

I'm able to use DataStructures 0.18 with these two changes (DiffEqBiological -> Catalyst >= 5 and NeuralNetDiffEq -> NeuralPDE >= 2).

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Oh yes, those two changes should be made. I guess CompatHelper didn't catch those because of the renames. Let's get those all swapped out and then use the rebuild command.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Regenerated in #327 . Looks like that worked. Thanks for pointing it out!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants