You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I thought it could be great to include the option of choosing and adding multiple OTUs to an entry of a couplet in the Dichotomous key. At this stage, only one OTU is possible. For instance, in the image below, in the left panel, I would have loved to add also more subfamilies other than Eristalinae.
Location
Dicothomous key
Screenshot, napkin sketch of interface, or conceptual description
Your role
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@DavideDalPos Interesting use-case, un-named clades. At present I don't anticipate adding this for a while but it's certainly a good issue. The TaxonWorky approach would be to make a place-holder OTU with name "Aidae, Bidae, Cidae" with some Content as to why this concept exists.
If I'm interpreting the screenshot correctly, it looks like this relates to #4145 as well, where otu(s) are being used to indicate intermediate progress, in this case at subfamily(ies) on the way from family to genus.
Feature or enhancement
I thought it could be great to include the option of choosing and adding multiple OTUs to an entry of a couplet in the Dichotomous key. At this stage, only one OTU is possible. For instance, in the image below, in the left panel, I would have loved to add also more subfamilies other than Eristalinae.
Location
Dicothomous key
Screenshot, napkin sketch of interface, or conceptual description
Your role
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: