You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
They should be defined and implemented in the calling crate rather than in diman.
For DebugStorageType, this is necessary because otherwise, a mismatch in version of glam will cause an error downstream (since DebugStorageType is only implemented for dimans version of glam)
For QProduct, this will clean up the interface and also allow getting rid of the tuple syntax via a definition like type Product<Q1, Q2=(), Q3=(), ...> = <Q1 as QProduct<...>>
which is currently not possible because it requires an impl of QProduct for () which we can only give if Dimension is crate-local
This also solves the minor issue of requiring use crate as diman in si/mod
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
They should be defined and implemented in the calling crate rather than in diman.
For
DebugStorageType
, this is necessary because otherwise, a mismatch in version ofglam
will cause an error downstream (sinceDebugStorageType
is only implemented for dimans version of glam)For
QProduct
, this will clean up the interface and also allow getting rid of the tuple syntax via a definition liketype Product<Q1, Q2=(), Q3=(), ...> = <Q1 as QProduct<...>>
which is currently not possible because it requires an impl of
QProduct
for()
which we can only give ifDimension
is crate-localThis also solves the minor issue of requiring
use crate as diman
insi/mod
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: