You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Pre-trained models' dice scores on the LungSeg dataset are mentioned two times in the Readme, but they differ.
The results in https://github.com/Tencent/MedicalNet#update20190730 look suspicious (it is suprising that ResNet10 performed significantly better than ResNet50).
Which results are reliable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Pre-trained models' dice scores on the LungSeg dataset are mentioned two times in the Readme, but they differ.
The results in https://github.com/Tencent/MedicalNet#update20190730 look suspicious (it is suprising that ResNet10 performed significantly better than ResNet50).
Which results are reliable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: