Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Media created" property not being recognized as possible create date #196

Closed
wicked-head opened this issue Apr 11, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@wicked-head
Copy link

Hi,

Some files got "rejected" because the program could not calculate the date, but looking into the file properties there is a property named "Media created" which represents the create date time of the file.

image

Is is possible to include that as part of the logic?

Thanks once again

@TheLastGimbus
Copy link
Owner

TheLastGimbus commented Apr 11, 2023

hi! did you again, modify files yourself to have this, or was this just as that?

as i understand, gpth couldn't find (or there was no?) json for this photo, and the exifDateExtractor didnt work for "media created"

sadly, the screenshot you gave me is so narrow i don't even know if this is a photo or video :// but i suppose it's a video since they usually have tags like that

in that case, gpth doesn't extract metadata from them because it's way more complicated than photos

we can try to perfect the json-matching then! show me the name of the file and it's json

(in general, your reports are very welcome but please give me more more details 🙏🙏🙏)

@wicked-head
Copy link
Author

Hi,

Yes its a video. and it is the same example as the file i've uploaded in issue 197.

I have not modified or change the file after the download from Google Photos and the .MOV file does not have any JSON.

If we duplicated the JSON from the .JPG for the .MOV would that theoretically work?

Thanks!

@TheLastGimbus
Copy link
Owner

If we duplicated the JSON from the .JPG for the .MOV would that theoretically work?

yes, i think we can add this to json-matching-algorithm soon 👀

for now, duplicate of #180

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants