Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: avoid suffocation at homeblocks #7463

Closed
MilesBHuff opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Suggestion: avoid suffocation at homeblocks #7463

MilesBHuff opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@MilesBHuff
Copy link

MilesBHuff commented Jun 11, 2024

Please explain your feature request to the best of your abilities:

At present, if a homeblock is set and then covered deeply underground, when players /t spawn there (I assume also /t outpost.), they suffocate with no way to escape. This can be abused by players.

Proposed solution: If the spawn location is buried in non-breatheable blocks, spawn at the closest Y-level at that X/Z coordinate with two breatheable blocks (or the world height, if no double breathables are found).

Seemingly good but actually fraught solution: Preventing players from placing things in the two voxels above the homeblock spawn surface. The problem with this solution, is that it prevents putting buttons and pressure plates and such. I know pressure plates can be used for evil; but in my own town, the pressure plate on the spawn surface actually plays the town anthem for spawner-inners. So, imho preventing the placement of carpet and redstone and whatever at the homeblock would be throwing out the baby with the bathwater. (This is also why I specified "breathable" blocks instead of just "air" blocks above.)

@LlmDl
Copy link
Member

LlmDl commented Jun 11, 2024

I'd have to see if the location can be altered when we teleport using PaperLib. This one should be a rule in your server that is heavily punished.

@MilesBHuff
Copy link
Author

This one should be a rule in your server that is heavily punished.

I definitely agree there, and it will be so.

@LlmDl LlmDl added this to the 0.100.5.0 milestone Sep 12, 2024
@LlmDl LlmDl closed this as completed in 263e1ea Sep 12, 2024
@LlmDl LlmDl assigned LlmDl and unassigned LlmDl Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants