Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Literal index support other that 1:N (or also support for reindexing) #20

Closed
khosravipasha opened this issue Jun 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@khosravipasha
Copy link
Collaborator

khosravipasha commented Jun 17, 2020

  1. Do we want to support reindxing? Might be useful when combining two different circuit with overlap in variables but the indexes are different (for example one variable could be x_1 in first cicuit but x_3 in second circuit).

  2. How does indexing of literals work after we do conjunction/disjunction/forgetting/conditinoing etc, specially if we want to save them and load them again later on.

@khosravipasha khosravipasha changed the title Indexing of variables after transformations Index of variables after transformations, reindexing, etc Jul 17, 2020
@khosravipasha khosravipasha changed the title Index of variables after transformations, reindexing, etc Support for reindexing, effects of transformations on variable indexes Jul 28, 2020
@khosravipasha khosravipasha changed the title Support for reindexing, effects of transformations on variable indexes Literal index support other that 1:N (or even support for reindexing) Nov 11, 2020
@khosravipasha khosravipasha changed the title Literal index support other that 1:N (or even support for reindexing) Literal index support other that 1:N (or also support for reindexing) Nov 11, 2020
@khosravipasha
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing, as the new api should support other than 1:N.
Reindexing might not be as useful, if needed we can reopen this later on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant