Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(Feature request) UX: image options clarification #863

Open
maphew opened this issue Dec 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

(Feature request) UX: image options clarification #863

maphew opened this issue Dec 30, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@maphew
Copy link

maphew commented Dec 30, 2024

Describe feature

The wording in image options is open to misinterpretation. There is a checkbox for "Enable compression" followed by settings for max image width and compression quality.

image

I had changed this to a relatively high defaults, 4096px and 86% and proceeded to upload and import many images thinking the quality would be kept, since with a couple of exceptions they were well under these limits.

This seems to be true for Jpeg, but PNG images are changet to Jpeg, leading things like losing transparency (see comments in #361 ). Since PNG are already compressed they should not be converted to Jpeg, however I can see that some folks might prefer the conversion and smaller size. (Probably the default compressed format should be webp, but that's a different issue).

This would need an additional setting and unknown amount of new code, so at least the wording should say what happens. (Also in the Import File dialog).

Additional Information

No response

@meichthys
Copy link
Contributor

If the second checkbox was changed to read: "Enable image compression and conversion to JPEG format", would that clarify it?

@maphew
Copy link
Author

maphew commented Dec 31, 2024

I would simplify to "Convert images to jpeg", and show quality setting before resize dimension.

I guess it would have been a better issue report if I included a suggestion to begin with ;-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants