Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tree Select支持指定选中策略 #624

Closed
pipinet opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #758
Closed

Tree Select支持指定选中策略 #624

pipinet opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #758
Labels
feature request New feature or request priority: low

Comments

@pipinet
Copy link

pipinet commented Jul 23, 2021

This function solves the problem (这个功能解决的问题)

Tree Select支持选中策略，例如：选中了一个节点的所有子节点，那么认为选中的父节点，而不是选中了父节点 子节点

Expected API (期望的 API)

增加如参如下，并实现改能力，后期扩展更多的选中策略
select-strategy: ['parent-only-when-all-children']
@github-actions github-actions bot added the feature request New feature or request label Jul 23, 2021
@XieZongChen XieZongChen added consideration-needed and removed feature request New feature or request labels Jul 24, 2021
@07akioni
Copy link
Collaborator

07akioni commented Jul 24, 2021 •
edited
Loading

这个东西需要改 treemate，我暂时是没空处理这个需求，你有兴趣可以看看

@LYErin LYErin mentioned this issue Aug 2, 2021
Merged
@Feellove
Copy link

能加个搜索？

@07akioni
Copy link
Collaborator

能加个搜索？

filterable

@pipinet pipinet changed the title Tree Select支持指定中策略 Tree Select支持指定选中策略 Aug 21, 2021
@zhaowp151
Copy link

树的选中事件 可以带出节点的配置信息吗

@07akioni
Copy link
Collaborator

07akioni commented Sep 2, 2021

树的选中事件 可以带出节点的配置信息吗

正在做

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature request New feature or request priority: low
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

feat(tree-select): add check strategy in tree-select LYErin/naive-ui
5 participants
@pipinet @07akioni @Feellove @zhaowp151 @XieZongChen