Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please add the option to include the wordmotion plugin #3390

Open
kmoschcau opened this issue Jan 18, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Please add the option to include the wordmotion plugin #3390

kmoschcau opened this issue Jan 18, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@kmoschcau
Copy link

Please add support for the vim-wordmotion plugin. It allows for motion commands to be more granular.

I would like there to be an option for this plugin (VSCodeVim), that enables the same behaviour which the wordmotion plugin adds.

An alternative would be to just add an option to alter VSCodeVim's motion commands to work in the same way as they do in the wordmotion plugin.

Here is a link to the wordmotion plugin repository: https://github.com/chaoren/vim-wordmotion

@wbthomason
Copy link

More generally, the ability to define custom motions/text objects would be amazing. I'm not sure how hard this would be to add?

@nickguo
Copy link

nickguo commented Jul 24, 2019

Are there any updates on this? Would love support for navigating through camelcase / underscored words!!

@ReedyBear
Copy link
Contributor

A somewhat similar issue:
#1096

@sql-koala
Copy link
Contributor

This is supported now:
https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim/blob/master/README.md#camelcasemotion
could be closed.

@kmoschcau
Copy link
Author

It does not seem to be quite the same. Wordmotion also supports treating hex color codes, hex literals, octal literals and binary literals as words. But I guess these can be treated as edge cases.

I am not using this plugin/VSCode anymore, so someone else feel free to make that call.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants