Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migaloo v2 #112

Closed
4 tasks
faddat opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
4 tasks

Migaloo v2 #112

faddat opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@faddat
Copy link
Collaborator

faddat commented Mar 8, 2023

Migaloo v2 tracking issue

The key feature of v2 is alliance. Any other features are nice-to-have at this stage.

Features:

  • Alliance

Fixes:

  • State sync

Nice-to-haves:

  • async-icq
  • bump wasmd to v0.31.x-4611

NOTE

  • cosmos-sdk v0.46.11 uses comet v0.34.27, and currently there's no version of skip for this. I'm checking with the Skip team currently.
@Sen-Com
Copy link
Contributor

Sen-Com commented Mar 9, 2023

Shall we squeeze in the updated token factory osmosis-labs/osmosis#4417 @faddat?

@alanwilhelm
Copy link

Is notional wasmd the only one that works with sdk 46?

@faddat
Copy link
Collaborator Author

faddat commented Mar 14, 2023

Yes.

So, full credit where it's due on CW, though. Confio's done a great job making contracts for cosmos. Basically what we've done is taken x/wasm from github.com/cosmwasm/wasmd and gotten it dressed up for sdk 46.

Confio is going to have an official release for sdk 47, though I am not sure that the default distro uses the token factory.

Notional's build of wasmd differs mainly in that it:

  • lints tests
  • supports the token factory in the same repo as wasmd, making it easier to integrate
  • improves on code formatting/linting
  • generally is better up to date with upstream

let there be no doubt: confio's work on the rust bits of wasmd are totally essential.

@faddat
Copy link
Collaborator Author

faddat commented Apr 11, 2023

the v2.0.0 release went off smoothly. One thing that we could have done better is some upgrade testing, possibly with interchaintest

@faddat faddat closed this as completed Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants