You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What do you think about exposing SourceGenerator and IncrementalGenerator though the separate package? E. g. if I wanted to write another source generator that writes [Register(typeof(SomeController), Scope.InstancePerResolution)] and IContainer<SomeController> for each controller in the project, it wouldn't work since source generators run separately. However, if there were some API, I could call StrongInject source generator from my source generator the same way you do it in the tests in the TestBase.cs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What do you think about exposing SourceGenerator and IncrementalGenerator though the separate package? E. g. if I wanted to write another source generator that writes
[Register(typeof(SomeController), Scope.InstancePerResolution)]
andIContainer<SomeController>
for each controller in the project, it wouldn't work since source generators run separately. However, if there were some API, I could call StrongInject source generator from my source generator the same way you do it in the tests in the TestBase.cs.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: