Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FAB action buttons are confusing #204

Closed
3esmit opened this issue Mar 18, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

FAB action buttons are confusing #204

3esmit opened this issue Mar 18, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@3esmit
Copy link

3esmit commented Mar 18, 2016

What is the nature of your issue
Enhancement, Question

Details
I don't feel confortable using FAB buttons for the actions zmNinja uses. Can we have a discussion on how we can improve UX?
First of all the playback are not in "normal" arrangement, this actions normally are side by side, rewind ate left, forward at right, play and pause at middle, etc...
There are too much FABs! Up to 10 floating action buttons is really bad; and in portrait view there are overflow and overplacing of the elements
There are many ways of doing this better...
Why not normal playback video style (Like in youtube)?

Top: [exit event view] [fill screen]
Bottom: [ <- prev / restart ] [play > / pause || ] [ faster forward +>] [ next -> ]

I don't see need for faster rewind...
Make this buttons always visible or visible upon single tap in video.

References:
https://www.google.com/design/spec/components/buttons-floating-action-button.html
https://dribbble.com/search?q=videoplayer
https://www.google.com/search?q=playback+material+ux&&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X

Thanks!

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

@pliablepixels
Copy link
Member

mostly laziness.

@pliablepixels
Copy link
Member

closing - lots of changes happened since then - fab is still there but convenience buttons in lists too

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants