Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug With the "gap" Option #2

Closed
Fishdrowned opened this issue Feb 5, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Bug With the "gap" Option #2

Fishdrowned opened this issue Feb 5, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@Fishdrowned
Copy link

Have a look at this, the second marquee with text "Short content":
http://jsfiddle.net/UUfn2/44/
I agreed that the gap option is a good idea, but I think it's safer not to implement the gap (i.e. duplicate the content) by default, unless it was specified.
Another problem is the speed issue which has been reported as #1 by knowj

@aamirafridi
Copy link
Owner

An option is added now so you can let it duplicate.? 6535215

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants