Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix RTL6g1 test. #258

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2016
Merged

Fix RTL6g1 test. #258

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2016

Conversation

tcard
Copy link
Contributor

@tcard tcard commented Feb 25, 2016

No description provided.

@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ class RealtimeClientChannel: QuickSpec {
expect(messageSent.messages![0].clientId).to(beNil())

let messageReceived = transport.protocolMessagesReceived.filter({ $0.action == .Message })[0]
expect(messageReceived.messages![0].clientId).to(beNil())
expect(messageReceived.messages![0].clientId).to(equal(options.clientId))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't agree with this change. It should be nil...

RTL6g1b

the clientId value is null for the Message when received

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this changed recently (ably/docs#91), it should've commented it in the commit.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mattheworiordan
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@tcard
Copy link
Contributor Author

tcard commented Feb 29, 2016

@ricardopereira PTAL

@ricardopereira
Copy link
Contributor

👍

ricardopereira added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2016
@ricardopereira ricardopereira merged commit fd85197 into master Feb 29, 2016
@ricardopereira ricardopereira deleted the fix-rtl6g1 branch February 29, 2016 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants