sbJSON itemLink associationType not translated

[jlblcc]

It appears the itemLink associationTypes are not making it through the translation.

Example SB item:https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5542394be4b0a658d793b55a

[stansmith907]

Yep, I see that I postponed this section because it was (is) a PINA and forgot to place a TODO tag. I just skipped it. Anyway, in there now.

Here are few item to contemplate...

• remember these do not go back into sbJson through the sbJson writer. The writer ignores building relatedItems, thus associated resources.
• There are two sbJson linkTypes we cannot translate; copyFrom/copyInto, precededBy/succeededBy. I just moved these values into the translator as is. However these were not added to the codelist.
• All associations entered into the translator are expressed as forward relationships. To accomplish this any sbJson reverse relationships are reversed by the reader.
• If sbJson link.type is missing or empty the association type is set to 'missing' since the associationType is required.

[jlblcc]

That all sounds fine to me. Yeah, writing associated items to ScienceBase is outside the scope. That will have to be handled by some kind of middle-ware. Definitely not interested in going beyond anything besides GET requests.