-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sun/security/pkcs11
tests failing on RHEL8 systems
#2900
Comments
Failures occurred on the s390x RHEL8 system too ... Will assign myself so I can discuss with the Red Hat internal team. |
sun/security/pkcs11
tests failing on test-aws-rhel8-x64-1sun/security/pkcs11
tests failing on RHEL8 systems
Upstream issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8295343 |
@smlambert What would you propose as the next action here? |
Exclude the tests in our problem lists under https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8295343 (and no we currently do not support by OS sub-flavours and supporting such granular exclusions is currently not in plan, unless somehow jtreg already offers that feature), and try to see an expedited fix to JDK-8295343 to be able to re-enable the tests quickly. |
See also https://ci.adoptium.net/job/Test_openjdk8_hs_extended.openjdk_x86-64_linux_testList_2/86/testReport/ and https://ci.adoptium.net/job/Test_openjdk8_hs_extended.openjdk_x86-64_linux_testList_0/82/testReport/ which ran on test-equinix_esxi-ubuntu2204-x64-1 and test-equinix_esxi-ubuntu2204-x64-2, suggesting that Ubuntu 22.04 may be subject to the same issues as they both failed the following in the
New grinders to determine problematic tests
RHEL8/x64 failures (JDK8):
On test-docker-ubuntu2204-x64-1 (JDK20):
On test-equinix_esxi-ubuntu2204-x64-1 (JDK8):
Ubuntu 20.04: https://ci.adoptium.net/job/Grinder/6905/ (Same three failures as Ubuntu 22.04) RHEL8/x64 JDK20: https://ci.adoptium.net/job/Grinder/6909/console - PASSED Ubuntu 22.04 x64 JDK20: All passed: https://ci.adoptium.net/job/Grinder/6904/ (I was assuming we'd have a nice simple list of things to exclude ... :-) ) On RHEL8/x64: JDK8 (14 failures) JDK11 (16 failures) JDK17 (12 failures) JDK19 (12 failures) JDK20 Nightly (0 failures!) (Note - failures can be /2 since each one is there twice for the
[*] - the top 3 in this table are the ones definitely related to the enforced minimum key lengths in RHEL8, and suggests a fix may have gone into to 17+ |
Need to determine correct actions in our exclude list or upstream in order to help this to pass consistently and run the appropriate tests. |
@judovana Can you confirm whether you've seen these on your systems, and if you've excluded them in line with the table above? |
I had checked all our rhel8 jobs, and the tests you are reffering are run, and passing. More details sent offlist. |
Summary of the above (unless otherwise stated these comparisons are on jdk8u/x64)
|
Builds without our custom CA Certs bundle for feeding to the upstream parameters in Grinder:
Running on UBI9 with the jdk21u build above at https://ci.adoptium.net/job/Grinder/11651/console (May take a while since there are a lot of jobs queued up) |
Showed the same four errors so it seems unrelated our custom cacerts. Running with Red Hat jdk21u on UBI9: https://ci.adoptium.net/job/Grinder/11717 - Failed the same four tests. |
Please set the title to indicate the test name and machine name where known.
To make it easy for the infrastructure team to repeat and diagnose, please
answer the following questions:
TARGET
ofjdk_security3_0
andjdk_security3_1
Test_
job on https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net which showed the failure: https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_x86-64_linux/102/testReport/Any other details: Split out from #2030 as that issue is resolved
See also #2360 and #1829 which are related to issues on this RHEL8 system.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: