Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding the initial notes for the Governance planning #2036

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

malvikasharan
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

Partially addresses #2035

  • Add the sections and bullet points for the Governance plan

List of changes proposed in this PR (pull-request)

  • Adding a draft file for the governance
  • Will archive some outdated files from the project management folder

What should a reviewer concentrate their feedback on?

  • What is missing from the current structure
  • Everything looks ok?

Acknowledging contributors

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 22, 2021

❌ Deploy Preview for the-turing-way failed.

🔨 Explore the source changes: 97d0dc8

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/the-turing-way/deploys/61f82aea17e6a700072afc09

@sgibson91
Copy link
Member

sgibson91 commented Feb 3, 2022

Just wanted to bring in my point from Slack, though not entirely sure where it fits in to this document specifically.

Leaders of working groups or any group working on a specific effort need a lightweight process by which to surface proposals/requests for feedback to the steering committee/appropriate governance body to assess whether the impact of a particular project-wide change is within the Turing Way's values and in the best interests of the projects.

A couple of discussions I've been involved in where knowing the stance of the core team would have been helpful include:

  • Should the Turing Way website have it's own domain name?
  • How do we handle the growing size of the repo? Which technical solution solves the problem without being too technical that we isolate a vast majority of the community?

Project Jupyter has Jupyter Enhancement Proposals as their process - though I do not think this is in anyway "lightweight", so not the greatest example.

@aleesteele
Copy link
Member

aleesteele commented May 10, 2022

Planning to work on some of these governance issues during the May book dash, referencing additional work being done at OLS: open-life-science/ols-5#31

@bsipocz
Copy link
Member

bsipocz commented Nov 4, 2024

We are in the middle of reorganizing the repository and as part of that work have moved some of the documents into a new repo. This has introcude code conflicts above, and therefore I am closing this pull request.

Could you please reopen this PR in the new PM or governance repo: https://github.com/the-turing-way/project-management or https://github.com/the-turing-way/governance

@bsipocz bsipocz closed this Nov 4, 2024
@bsipocz bsipocz added the reopen elsewhere PR should be reopened in another repository label Nov 4, 2024
@JimMadge JimMadge mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2024
5 tasks
@JimMadge
Copy link
Member

JimMadge commented Nov 5, 2024

This PR has been moved to here 🙏.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: unreviewed project governance reopen elsewhere PR should be reopened in another repository
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants