Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using 0.3mm vias #8

Open
smesgr9000 opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Consider using 0.3mm vias #8

smesgr9000 opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@smesgr9000
Copy link

First of all - Thanks for sharing the PCB layout

It would be nice if the via size is increased to 0.3mm - reason I want to use PCBWay for manufacturing the PCB and cost for 5 PCBs increase from 5USD to ~50USD due to via size been smaller than 0.3mm.

I did a quick hack to increase the via size and moved some tracks and placed an order - which is currently processed. I can share my hack if you want - but you are properly better at this than me. 😭

@alvarop
Copy link
Owner

alvarop commented Jun 11, 2023

I'll try to get this later. I just did a new spin with updated components, but didn't have the time to update all the vias. Plus the new USB-C connector probably also requires fancy boards due to the spacing :/

@R3Q13M
Copy link

R3Q13M commented Jun 12, 2023

@alvarop thanks for looking into this. I actually forked the design for myself to address this issue as well as issue #10 but haven't gotten very far. I'd just like to suggest that good rule of thumb for via annular ring size for low-cost PCB's is via diameter plus around 12mils. So I'd recommend for a 0.3mm via a ~0.6mm diameter annular ring.

Also, these through-hole USB-C connector holes are 0.4mm, 0.65mm annular ring, and pitched 0.8mm apart. Therefore, the minimum copper spacing is 0.15mm. For most fabs 0.15mm is about the limit for their low-cost tiers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants