You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice if the via size is increased to 0.3mm - reason I want to use PCBWay for manufacturing the PCB and cost for 5 PCBs increase from 5USD to ~50USD due to via size been smaller than 0.3mm.
I did a quick hack to increase the via size and moved some tracks and placed an order - which is currently processed. I can share my hack if you want - but you are properly better at this than me. 😭
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'll try to get this later. I just did a new spin with updated components, but didn't have the time to update all the vias. Plus the new USB-C connector probably also requires fancy boards due to the spacing :/
@alvarop thanks for looking into this. I actually forked the design for myself to address this issue as well as issue #10 but haven't gotten very far. I'd just like to suggest that good rule of thumb for via annular ring size for low-cost PCB's is via diameter plus around 12mils. So I'd recommend for a 0.3mm via a ~0.6mm diameter annular ring.
Also, these through-hole USB-C connector holes are 0.4mm, 0.65mm annular ring, and pitched 0.8mm apart. Therefore, the minimum copper spacing is 0.15mm. For most fabs 0.15mm is about the limit for their low-cost tiers.
First of all - Thanks for sharing the PCB layout
It would be nice if the via size is increased to 0.3mm - reason I want to use PCBWay for manufacturing the PCB and cost for 5 PCBs increase from 5USD to ~50USD due to via size been smaller than 0.3mm.
I did a quick hack to increase the via size and moved some tracks and placed an order - which is currently processed. I can share my hack if you want - but you are properly better at this than me. 😭
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: