-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PostgreSQL db names should allow dots #106
Comments
the prev discussion is available on ansible/ansible#66422 |
This was referenced Apr 15, 2020
there is one more similar pr without a review #198 |
I created a new issue (general) #210 instead. |
This was referenced Apr 27, 2020
This was referenced May 5, 2020
This was referenced May 6, 2020
This was referenced May 7, 2020
This was referenced May 9, 2020
amenzhinsky
pushed a commit
to amenzhinsky/community.general
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2020
adds secure_password property - fixes ansible-collections#110 updates notes updates readme
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Copied from original issue: ansible/ansible#66422 @raneq on 2020, 13 Jan
SUMMARY
Using postgresql database module can't contain dots, but should be able to, as escaped characters. Although it's not a good practice, it's supported by postgresql and under certain circumstances some applications force you to create databases with dots inside (like Odoo), so Ansible becomes the limiting agent here.
In #63204 I asked for this feature for users and dbs but @Andersson007 worked first on the user module and asked to create a new issue for the db module.
ISSUE TYPE
Bug Report
COMPONENT NAME
postgresql_db
ANSIBLE VERSION
AFAIK, the bug/feature hasn't been fixed/implemented at 2.9, so it is still relevant.
CONFIGURATION
(nothing)
OS / ENVIRONMENT
Debian 10 "Buster" running against localhost
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
Use this playbook in a Debian-like cleanable environment:
Then execute:
EXPECTED RESULTS
I expected Ansible to create escaped names, as PostgreSQL supports it.
ACTUAL RESULTS
COMMENTS
Please, don't close automatically this issue as long as there's people asking for this and there's no human saying it won't happen for some reason. Thanks!
RELATED
This issue follows the track of issues:
#63204 by @raneq
#22568 by @indreek
And these closed PR:
#22601 by @indreek
#30828 by @pilou-
And these discarded (why?) PR by @Andersson007 :
#64006
#64053
#64084
#64131
And these merged PR by @Andersson007
#64007
#63565
#63942
POTENTIALLY INTERESTED PEOPLE
People asking for a fix in the related issues and PR: @Spindel @padraiglennon @MannerMan @kmmbvnr @kyrofa @mridude23 Can you show your interest if this new issue is also meaningful to you?
Thank you everyobdy!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: