You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We need to develop a more comprehensive and consistent approach to validation across all of GraphAr's tools and libraries. As the first step, to redesign and unify the implementation of validation for Writer and Builder in the C++ library.
Describe the solution you'd like
define the validation level in utils
clarify the concepts of weak validate-level and strong validate-level
hide the Validate interface to users and use validate-level as a parameter of the writing operation
unify the implementation in Writer and Builder
Additional context
Next steps is to extend the validation level to other tools and libraries of other languages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lixueclaire
changed the title
[Feat] Redesign and unify the implementation of validation in C++ Writer/Builder
[Feat][C++] Redesign and unify the implementation of validation in C++ Writer/Builder
Jun 5, 2023
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We need to develop a more comprehensive and consistent approach to validation across all of GraphAr's tools and libraries. As the first step, to redesign and unify the implementation of validation for
Writer
andBuilder
in the C++ library.Describe the solution you'd like
Validate
interface to users and use validate-level as a parameter of the writing operationWriter
andBuilder
Additional context
Next steps is to extend the validation level to other tools and libraries of other languages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: