Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Story, design and implementation for secrets management #776

Open
snazy opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Story, design and implementation for secrets management #776

snazy opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@snazy
Copy link
Member

snazy commented Jan 15, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Polaris does requires secrets like storage credentials and access credentials for remote systems.

Those secrets can currently only be configured statically via the configuration or persisted, latter is rather static as well. Also, secrets are currently persisted in various very different ways / property keys.

It would be much better to have a consistent way to access secrets and (let them) manage those in a secure way. At best, secrets would not even be stored in Polaris, but managed by trusted secrets managers.

All secrets should be considered "ephemeral" - meaning: secrets can be rotated at any time without even noticing Polaris. Already assuming in the design that secrets can be rotated at any without being noticed makes it easier for users and system integrators.

Describe the solution you'd like

No response

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@snazy snazy added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 15, 2025
@snazy
Copy link
Member Author

snazy commented Jan 16, 2025

There some prior art that could serve as a source for thoughts: https://projectnessie.org/nessie-latest/configuration/#secrets-manager-settings

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant