Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-32945][SQL] Avoid collapsing projects if reaching max allowed common exprs #29950
[SPARK-32945][SQL] Avoid collapsing projects if reaching max allowed common exprs #29950
Changes from all commits
f418714
98843dd
1b567e7
76509b3
43eb50d
4bf4dc2
9bfafc7
c2c01e4
4990375
e8f18f8
58e71d8
bbaae3e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason to change from
transformUp
totransformDown
? If the all test passed, it would be safe if we keep the original one.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found the previous comment about supporting
withColumn
. If this is designed for that, shall we add a test case for that?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could extend to other cases like
case p @ Project(_, agg: Aggregate)
, but leave it untouched for now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
upper operators
->upper operator
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
than allowed
->than the maximum
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we set this value to 1, all the existing tests can pass?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess not. We might have at lease few common expressions in collapsed projection. If set to 1, any duplicated expression is not allowed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Just a comment) Even if we set
spark.sql.optimizer.excludedRules
toCollapseProject
, it seems like Spark still respects this value inScanOperation
? That behaviour might be okay, but it looks a bit weird to me.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, but currently if we exclude
CollapseProject
,ScanOperation
will work and collapse projections. Maybe update this doc?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hm I see. Yea, updating the doc sounds nice to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
larger than zero
->positive
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
indentation? Maybe, the following is better?