-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-7845] [Build] Bump "Hadoop 1" tests to version 1.2.1 #6384
Conversation
LGTM pending tests |
Test build #33428 has finished for PR 6384 at commit
|
LGTM |
Thanks! I am merging it to master and branch 1.4. |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7845 Author: Yin Huai <[email protected]> Closes #6384 from yhuai/hadoop1Test and squashes the following commits: 82fcea8 [Yin Huai] Use hadoop 1.2.1 (a stable version) for hadoop 1 test. (cherry picked from commit bfbc0df) Signed-off-by: Yin Huai <[email protected]>
Minor point of process: merging something like this for 1.4 probably doesn't matter either way as it affects Jenkins builds, but, probably shouldn't be then? no harm done but then I wonder, can we mark this as fixed for 1.4.0? If RC2 is final (and I somehow doubt it won't be) then this is not fixed for 1.4.0 |
@srowen Yeah, only merging this kind of prs to master makes sense. Thank you for pointing it out. Regarding the fix version, what will be a good practice to set fix version(s) for jiras that get merged after a RC? Maybe add a label to the jira when it is merged and after the release, we check if the fix version is correctly set for those jiras? For example, because this one was merged after RC2, we add a |
I don't know, it's an interesting question. Right now there are some things I'd like to merge for 1.4.1 but we can't really do that now. You can mark them |
oh, actually, for this one, we indeed want this change affects our 1.4 jenkins build. If we only merge it to master, 1.4 jenkins build will not be changed, right? |
True, yes if this needs to affect the 1.4 branch it should go in at some point; if it were a more delicate change it could be done after the release for 1.4.1. For this it isn't a big deal in any event, I was just wondering out loud about how we manage this. |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7845 Author: Yin Huai <[email protected]> Closes apache#6384 from yhuai/hadoop1Test and squashes the following commits: 82fcea8 [Yin Huai] Use hadoop 1.2.1 (a stable version) for hadoop 1 test.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7845 Author: Yin Huai <[email protected]> Closes apache#6384 from yhuai/hadoop1Test and squashes the following commits: 82fcea8 [Yin Huai] Use hadoop 1.2.1 (a stable version) for hadoop 1 test.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7845 Author: Yin Huai <[email protected]> Closes apache#6384 from yhuai/hadoop1Test and squashes the following commits: 82fcea8 [Yin Huai] Use hadoop 1.2.1 (a stable version) for hadoop 1 test.
…adoop-1 to 1.2.1 PR #5694 reverted PR #6384 while refactoring `dev/run-tests` to `dev/run-tests.py`. Also, PR #6384 didn't bump Hadoop 1 version defined in POM. Author: Cheng Lian <[email protected]> Closes #7062 from liancheng/spark-7845 and squashes the following commits: c088b72 [Cheng Lian] Bumping default Hadoop version used in profile hadoop-1 to 1.2.1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7845