TyphoonInjectionAware

[jasperblues]

• Can we call this TyphoonComponentFactoryAware ?

. . . meaning the class wishes to do the reverse of dependency injection - using the factory as a service locator

Also, on the interface the factory is type id - is this so we can return an assembly type?

• Can we add some API doc to this class.
• Can we add some users docs (not sure what page to put the user docs on).

[rhgills]

TyphoonComponentFactoryAware seems better, I agree. I just renamed that.

Originally it was, but I think it might be better to type that to TyphoonComponentFactory and have the user cast it appropriately.

We should document, which should be fairly simple as the class is fairly simple.

[rhgills]

Thinking about this more, we definitely should have a type TyphoonComponentFactory, especially in the case where you're using a component with an XML assembly.

Changed and pushed.

[jasperblues]

Ok. . . perhaps we should push to CoocaPods as well? That way I can update this question:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20405636/typhoon-injecting-a-view-controller-provider/20414089#20414089

I'll push as v1.6.2