From c41e329bc40cf31cd650a321b0361879b97a1917 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:42:00 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Detect named expressions in decorators before Python 3.9

Summary
--

This PR detects another syntax error from #6591 and is stacked on #16383. This
time the relaxed grammar for decorators proposed in [PEP
614](https://peps.python.org/pep-0614/) is detected for Python 3.8 and lower.

The 3.8 grammar for decorators is
[here](https://docs.python.org/3.8/reference/compound_stmts.html#grammar-token-decorators):

```
decorators                ::=  decorator+
decorator                 ::=  "@" dotted_name ["(" [argument_list [","]] ")"] NEWLINE
dotted_name               ::=  identifier ("." identifier)*
```

in contrast to the current grammar
[here](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#grammar-token-python-grammar-decorators)

```
decorators                ::= decorator+
decorator                 ::= "@" assignment_expression NEWLINE
assignment_expression ::= [identifier ":="] expression
```

This was the trickiest one of these to detect yet. It seemed like the best
approach was to attempt to parse the old version and fall back on the new
grammar if anything goes wrong, but I'm not as confident in this approach since
it required adding a `Parser::try_parse_old_decorators` method.

Test Plan
--

New inline parser tests and linter CLI tests.