Skip to content

astrojimig/precalculated-dr17-selfunc

Repository files navigation

Pre-computed Selection Function for APOGEE DR17

Welcome! This is a small repository containing the final selection function for the APOGEE survey, along with some simple tutorials for how to apply it for your science case.

If you have any questions, please reach out to me at [email protected]!

Included Files

  • apogeeCombinedSF.dat.zip - the pre-computed raw (2D) selection function for APOGEE DR17 computed on December 16, 2022.
  • TUTORIAL1.ipynb - a jupyter notebook tutorial for how to work with the raw selection function.
  • TUTORIAL2.ipynb - a jupyter notebook tutorial for how to calculate the effective (3D) selection function from the raw selection function.
  • JHK_isochrones.txt - sample PARSEC isochrones used in TUTORIAL2

Additional Files Coming Soon:

  • effective_selfunc.dat (coming soon!) - the pre-computed effective selection function used in Imig et al. 2023 (in prep)

Important Caveats

  • This selection function is only valid for APOGEE main survey targets, stars that were targeted randomly from 2MASS. You can easily select main survey targets in the APOGEE allStar file using the criterion allStar['EXTRATARG']==0. Do not use this selection function for non-main survey targets, as it will be an underestimate of the true selection fraction for those stars.
  • Some of the halo stars were not targeted on 2MASS photometry, but on additional Washington+DDO51 photometry (more detail found here). Therefore, the 2MASS-based selection function here may not be accurate for all halo fields. If you plan to use this selection function to study the Galactic halo, be cautious of this! In most cases, this results in an overestimate of the selection fraction for halo fields, in a few cases even exceeding 100%. Relevant stars are flagged with the APOGEE_TARGET1 targeting bits APOGEE2_WASH_GIANT or APOGEE2_WASH_DWARF (documented more here) to easily identify the affected fields.
  • There is a minor known issue for 14 (out of 1937) fields in the current selection function where the color limit returns NaN. A fix coming soon!!

Dependencies

You'll need an installation of the apogee and mwdust packages for this, along with some standard python packages (numpy, astropy, matplotlib, etc.)

How to Cite

If you use this selection function for published work, please cite Imig et al. 2023 (in prep) for this selection function, and Bovy et al. 2016a or Bovy et al. 2016b for the original apogee code used to calculate the selection function.

Raw Selection Function

The raw selection function, which I like to think of as the 2D selection function, reflects the targeting strategies of APOGEE. Targets in APOGEE were selected randomly from the 2MASS catalog1, so the raw selection function is the ratio of the number of observed stars in APOGEE divided by the total number of possible targets in 2MASS, for each location on the 2D sky (APOGEE field).

1: This description is a vast oversimplification of the targeting strategies! For more detail, see the APOGEE targeting webpage, or the citations Zasowski et al. 2013, Zasowski et al. 2017, Beaton et al. 2021, and Santana et al. 2021. The targeting strategies, and therefore the raw selection function, is split into different cohorts (defined by apparent magnitudes) and different color bins, which both vary between fields. The final product returns the selection fraction given the APOGEE field, apparent H magnitude, and (J-K) color of a given star.

Raw Selection Function Figure 1: The raw selection function for APOGEE, showing the selection fraction of observations for each APOGEE field (location on the sky). Near the plane of the disk, the selection fraction is generally low, simply because there are more stars in those fields. Near the galactic poles in the halo, the selection fraction is generally high.

Effective Selection Function

The effective (or 3D) selection function is the ratio of the observed number of stars in APOGEE divided by the intrinsic number of stars in the Milky Way as a function of 3D Heliocentric position. This includes the effects of the raw selection function, with some additional ingredients of distances, isochrones (to assume some intrinsic distribution on the HR diagram) and a 3D Milky Way dust map. This is a more complex application of the selection function and will largely depend on your planned science case.

For example, you may want to split up the effective selection for different metallicities (as done in Mackereth & Bovy 2020), or by both metallicity and stellar ages (as in Mackereth et al. 2017). You may want smaller or larger sized bins than adopted by previous work, or a different range of distances sampled. Depending on how you define your data sample in APOGEE (cuts in surface gravity, kinematics, etc.), this should also be reflected in the effective selection function for best results.

Effective Selection Function

Figure 2: The effective selection function for APOGEE, showing the selection fraction along different lines of sight. Generally, the selection fraction is larger close to the Sun, and decreases with distance.

Other Useful Resources

A collection of additional resources related to the APOGEE selection function.

SDSS Webpages

Papers Using the Selection Function (not a complete list!)

Additional code repositories & tutorials

About

Pre-calculated Selection Function for APOGEE DR-17

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published