You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
And I guess the changes to the API would be minimal, but we'd have a nicer repr. Or is there a specific reason that I missed for this?
Also,could we return the description directly instead of the astropy.io.votable.tree.Resource ? The only other information that I think might be useful would be the number of rows in the catalog.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So, this motivated #3028 which will make find_catalogs way faster. However, switching to a dictionary will remove the possibility to do this (in the docs here):
Since astroquery is for python > 3.10, I was wondering if you'd be on board to switch the result of
Vizier.find_tables
to normal dictionaries here:astroquery/astroquery/vizier/core.py
Line 836 in 25e6521
I was thinking something like:
And I guess the changes to the API would be minimal, but we'd have a nicer repr. Or is there a specific reason that I missed for this?
Also,could we return the description directly instead of the
astropy.io.votable.tree.Resource
? The only other information that I think might be useful would be the number of rows in the catalog.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: