We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fedora plans to reclassify the CC0 license such that it would no longer be allowed for code. There is an explanation from Fedora's legal https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/RRYM3CLYJYW64VSQIXY6IF3TCDZGS6LM/ and there is some commentary at https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/25/fedora_sours_on_creative_commons/
The CC0 license is very similar to MIT or ISC licenses and either might be a suitable substitute. Similarly the Apache license might be suitable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be something for @audreyt to review
Sorry, something went wrong.
It looks like https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/perl-Module-Signature/perl-Module-Signature/ is still around — @djzort do you have an ETA on when it will be delisted without a license change?
audreyt
No branches or pull requests
Fedora plans to reclassify the CC0 license such that it would no longer be allowed for code. There is an explanation from Fedora's legal https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/RRYM3CLYJYW64VSQIXY6IF3TCDZGS6LM/ and there is some commentary at https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/25/fedora_sours_on_creative_commons/
The CC0 license is very similar to MIT or ISC licenses and either might be a suitable substitute. Similarly the Apache license might be suitable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: