Scope conflict detection more narrowly in JSONSchema conversion #978
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes:
When creating JSONSchema from a Smithy model, any two conflicting shapes with
the same unqualified name would cause the process to fail, when in most cases
the conflict is only important if it occurs between two shapes connected to
the service in question.
CloudFormation resource schema generation must consider additional shapes
via @cfnResource's additionalSchemas property. This property is read by
the CFN index and subsequently discarded, so I simply disabled the more
narrowly-scoped conflict detection for CFN specifically. This can be removed
once shapes can be connected directly to a service.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.