class: middle, center, title-slide count: false
Lecture 4: Transformers, power flow analysis part 2
Bertrand Cornélusse
[email protected]
- The power transformer
- The next part of power flow analysis: how to include transformers and transformers with tap changers
You will be able to do exercises 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 from Ned Mohan's book.
class: middle
A (single phase) transformer is made of two magnetically coupled coils or windings. An ideal transformer is a two-port represented as
.grid[
.kol-1-2[.width-80[]]
.kol-1-2[
with
In power systems, transformers are mainly used to transmit power over long distances by changing the voltage level, thus decreasing the current for a given power level. The voltage level of a synchronous generator is around 20kV.
Voltage is changed around five times between generation and load.
It is also used to measure currents and voltages, electrically isolate parts of a circuit (not the auto-transformer we will see), and match impedances.
class: middle, center, black-slide
<iframe width="600" height="450" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vh_aCAHThTQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>The ideal model is complemented by elements
-
$X_m$ that models the magnetizing inductance -
$X_{leakage, i}$ that models the flux not captured by the core on side$i$ -
$R_{core}$ that models eddy current and hysteresis losses, i.e., losses in the iron core -
$R_{1}$ and$R_{2}$ that model (coil) copper losses
Parameters are either given in the datasheet or obtained by open-circuit and short-circuit tests.
Laminated core to decrease losses.
The excitation current, the sum of the currents in
.grid[
.kol-1-2[.center.width-90[]]
.kol-1-2[
with
Let's consider the rated voltages and currents on both sides of the (ideal) transformer as base values. As
.grid[
.kol-1-2[
Hence, in per unit, the transformer can be replaced by a single impedance
$$Z_{tr} = \frac{Z_{p}}{Z_{p, base}}+\frac{Z_{s}}{Z_{s, base}}.$$
]
.kol-1-2[
.center.width-100[]
]]
Thus we have also that $$\begin{aligned}Z_{tr} &= \frac{Z_{p}+ Z_s/n^2}{Z_{p, base}} \\ &= \frac{n^2 Z_{p} + Z_s}{Z_{s, base}}\end{aligned}$$ i.e. the impedance is the same whether we see it from the primary or the secondary side, although the voltage bases differ.
Also, if the three-phase transformer is wye-delta connected, a 30° phase shift must be applied (more on this later).
Consider the one-line diagram
with
- a 200 km line with
$R = 0.029 \Omega/km$ ,$X=0.326 \Omega/km$ , neglected shunt impedances - two transformers with a leakage reactance of
$0.2 pu$ in the (500 kV, 1000 MVA) base, and losses neglected.
What is the equivalent model in a (345 kV, 100 MVA) base?
-
$Z_{line, pu} = 200 \times (0.029 + j 0.326) / (500^2/1000) = 0.0232 + j 0.2608 pu$ -
hence, the total impedance between buses 1 and 2 is
$$Z_{12} = 0.0232 + j 0.2608 + 2 * j 0.2pu = 0.0232 + j 0.6608 pu $$
-
the pu value of the impedance is the same in the (500 kV, 1000 MVA) and (345 kV, 1000 MVA) bases,
-
since we can transfer the impedance from one side of each transformer to the other, cf. a previous remark
-
if we now change the MVA base to 100 MVA,
$$Z_{12} = (0.0232 + j 0.6608) \times (100/1000) pu = 0.00232 + j 0.06608 pu$$ since the base impedance is proportional to the inverse of the MVA base.
The efficiency expressed in % is
- maximal when loaded such that copper losses = iron losses (cancel derivative of efficiency w.r.t current)
- Around 99.5 % in large power transformers at full load.
- Some transformers are equipped with a system allowing to change the
$1:n$ ratio - The ability to change the tap under load is called load tap changer (LTC) or on-load tap changer (OLTC)
- This is mainly used for voltage control
- It is usually implemented using auto-transformers
- We will see later on how to include this in the power flow analysis
class: middle, center, black-slide
<iframe width="600" height="450" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/R_NxRDXOEFk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>The two windings (of the same phase) are connected in series, without galvanic insulation. They are commonly used when the ratio is limited.
Advantages:
- Physically smaller
- less costly (less copper)
- higher efficiency
- easy to implement tap changes
- "solid" earth grounding
Disadvantages:
- no electrical insulation
- higher short circuit current
- full voltage at secondary if it breaks (in case of a step down)
class: middle, center, black-slide
<iframe width="600" height="450" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lltVwhoPvh0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>The star part has
Let's reason on phase
- Voltage
$\bar{V}_{a,s}$ is on the same core as$\bar{V}_{AC,p} = \sqrt{3}\bar{V}_{a,p} \angle{-30^\circ}$ where$\bar{V}_{a,p}$ is the (virtual) phase-neutral voltage on the primary side. - Since
$\bar{V}_{a,s} = n \bar{V}_{AC,p}$ ,$\bar{V}_{a,s} = n\sqrt{3} \bar{V}_{a,p} \angle{-30^\circ}$
We gain a $\sqrt{3}$ factor in the amplification, but a lagging phase shift of 30°.
The same reasoning holds for phases
We have seen in lecture 2 that active power flows are dictated by the voltage magnitudes but also the sine of the angle difference between buses:
.grid[
.kol-1-2[
.center.width-100[]]
.kol-1-2[
$$\begin{aligned}
S_r &= \bar{V}_r\bar{I}^* = V_r \left(\frac{V_s \angle -\delta - V_r}{-jX}\right) \\
&= \frac{V_s V_r \sin \delta }{X} +j \frac{V_s V_r \cos \delta - V^2_r}{X}
\end{aligned}$$
If we have a device that can generate an adjustable phase shift, we can control the power flows. This is the purpose of phase-shifting transformers.
In practice phase shifting is achieved by "combining the signal with a fraction of itself shifted by 90°". For the details of how it is implemented or modeled, see
- Wikipedia
- Section 5.7. of the Weedy or ELEC0014.
- ENTSO-E - Phase Shift Transformers Modelling, Version 1.0.0, May 2015
380/380 kV: in series with:
- line Zandvliet (B) - Borssele (NL) and Zandvliet (B) - Geertruidenberg (NL)
- line Meerhout (B) - Maasbracht (NL)
- line Gramme (B) - Maasbracht (NL)
- nominal power 3VN Imax = 1400 MVA
- phase shift adjustment: 35 positions, +17/-17 × 1.5° (at no load)
.footnote[From ELEC0014.]
220/150 kV :
- in series with the Chooz (F) - Monceau (B) line nominal power: 400 MVA
- in-phase adjustment: 21 positions, +10/-10 × 1.5 %
- quadrature adjustment: 21 positions, +10/-10 × 1.2°
.footnote[From ELEC0014.]
In three-phase operation,
- either there are three separate single-phase transformers (easier to fix when there is a problem on a phase, more modular)
- or a three-phase transformer, that is a single core with three auto-transformers on it, cf. the video at the beginning of this presentation (cheaper, lighter core and less copper).
Some transformers called three-winding transformers are equipped with a third winding (not to be confused with a three-phase transformer) that is used for auxiliary purposes (feeding auxiliary devices e.g., fans, providing reactive power support, ...).
class: middle
A transformer, in the per-unit representation, can thus be represented
- as a two-port if the shunt admittance is considered
- as a simple series leakage impedance if the shunt admittance is neglected
Let
- if $ 0 < t \leq 1$, this corresponds to a simple tap-changer
- if $ 0 < |t| \leq 1$ but is complex, then this is a phase-shifter (
$\angle{t} < \pi/2$ )] .kol-1-2[.center.width-90[]]]
We have
Thus tap and phase shift can be represented by the admittance matrix
- if $ 0 < t \leq 1$, this can be represented as a
$\pi$ two-port - if $ 0 < |t| \leq 1$ but is complex, this is not the case
In the power flow analysis, you must pay attention to this when constructing the system-wide admittance matrix.
See python notebook / video recording.
- Mohan, Ned. Electric power systems: a first course. John Wiley & Sons, 2012. Chapter 6.
- Weedy, Birron Mathew, et al. Electric power systems. John Wiley & Sons, 2012. Section 3.8, Section 5.7.
- Course notes of ELEC0014 by Pr. Thierry Van Cutsem.
class: end-slide, center count: false
The end.