You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The requested variant shape does not go too far away from Iosevka's design.
The requested variant does not conflict with any characters in Unicode that Iosevka currently supports.
At least two monospace/programming fonts, created by different designers, supported the requested variant. Provide images below.
My favorite implementation of ẞ/ß is probably from DejaVu, but there are not currently any variants available for the capital version like there are for the lowercase version. The current ſs ligature option for the lowercase form is honestly sufficient, but it unfortunately has no effect on the shape of the capital version.
Example in Deja Vu Sans, with my favorite ẞ/ß glyphs of any font:
comparison with Iosevka Aile, with a nice lowercase form but unaltered capital form:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For what it's worth, here's how Lucida Grande does it:
I like it just as much as DejaVu's glyph, or perhaps more, but Lucida Grande isn't easily obtainable these days.
I'm wondering if this is worth a PR.
I'm also wondering whether the variant selector should be put right before the one for lowercase eszet or at the end of the capital Latin letter section.
My favorite implementation of ẞ/ß is probably from DejaVu, but there are not currently any variants available for the capital version like there are for the lowercase version. The current ſs ligature option for the lowercase form is honestly sufficient, but it unfortunately has no effect on the shape of the capital version.


Example in Deja Vu Sans, with my favorite ẞ/ß glyphs of any font:
comparison with Iosevka Aile, with a nice lowercase form but unaltered capital form:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: