-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docker images not containing JavaFX #84
Comments
If useful, here's a small bash script to build Liberica Docker images with javafx enabled, based on original Liberica-provided https://github.com/nicolabeghin/liberica-openjdk-with-javafx |
thanks for sharing, the Dockerfiles are provided exactly for the purpose of making such customizations possible. Our major focus is on keeping the base Liberica image size small, thus we currently do not plan to include FX in the base Liberica image. It would be interesting to understand the specific use case for JDK with FX inside docker images, if we may be underestimating how wide-spread such a use case is. |
Thanks, my use case is to build desktop JavaFX apps in the existing CI/CD tool (Gitlab in this case). |
This would be really needed and it is not a big thing to add. Many applications need this in CI pipelines etc. For example, the only thing changing would be from this URL: via an optional environment variable in the Dockerfile for every tag. |
I just stumbled upon this issue, and was surprised that there is no |
Hi everyone
I see that JavaFX is excluded from Docker images - checked JDK 11 and 17, both on Alpine/Debian/CentOS.
ref. https://github.com/bell-sw/Liberica/blob/master/docker/repos/liberica-openjdk-debian/17/Dockerfile#L155
Any reason behind this?
thanks
nicola
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: