You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would like to discuss release management for the project.
Currently we use simple incrementing release, but I'd like to have the ability to qualify releases against our test suite and tag them appropriately. Not every release should go through full cycle IMO.
Open to thoughts, etc. If we don't come up with some consensus, I will simply formulate what I think works best and move on by ~Late October, per my current testing plans.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've tagged our current master as v0.3.0 - a prerelease. I am down for going through a full cycle, and then tagging the result that as a v1.0.0 for production use. Your timeline works for me
Would like to discuss release management for the project.
Currently we use simple incrementing release, but I'd like to have the ability to qualify releases against our test suite and tag them appropriately. Not every release should go through full cycle IMO.
Open to thoughts, etc. If we don't come up with some consensus, I will simply formulate what I think works best and move on by ~Late October, per my current testing plans.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: