Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust default buyer security deposit by spread #2311

Closed
ManfredKarrer opened this issue Jan 23, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Adjust default buyer security deposit by spread #2311

ManfredKarrer opened this issue Jan 23, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Contributor

To avoid that buyers can decide to not complete the trade in case price has moved against them we should increase the default value for the buyer security deposit for highly volatile markets.
One metrics we might be able to use is the spread. Usually high volatility is reflected in high spread and we have that data already available.

A more sophisticated method would be to measure volatility from the trade statistics data.

If volatility is higher we could use that as factor to increase the default deposit value (0.01 BTC).

Beside that we should move to % based values.

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

Just referencing two issues regarding this topic:

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 24, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the was:dropped label Apr 24, 2019
@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Still relevant

@stale stale bot removed the was:dropped label Apr 27, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 26, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the was:dropped label Jul 26, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 2, 2019

This issue has been automatically closed because of inactivity. Feel free to reopen it if you think it is still relevant.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Aug 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants