You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I believe that there is something wrong with the fee estimation implemented in #5235
I cant find what it is, but the final behaviour here is that it gets a value that is not coming from the mempool.space api (is it an average?) and it also has a 10sats/vb hardcoded minimum.
The image below shows that 21sats/vb, but the minimumFee was 1sat/vb (as far as I can tell from the code, it should use 2xminimumFee).
If I try 10sats/vb, it will accept it, but not less.
Version
1.6.4
Steps to reproduce
Try to change the minumum fee.
Expected behaviour
Should accept at least 2 x minimumFee, but stucks to 10 or a number that it takes from an unknown place.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
I believe that there is something wrong with the fee estimation implemented in #5235
I cant find what it is, but the final behaviour here is that it gets a value that is not coming from the mempool.space api (is it an average?) and it also has a 10sats/vb hardcoded minimum.
The image below shows that 21sats/vb, but the minimumFee was 1sat/vb (as far as I can tell from the code, it should use 2xminimumFee).
If I try 10sats/vb, it will accept it, but not less.
Version
1.6.4
Steps to reproduce
Try to change the minumum fee.
Expected behaviour
Should accept at least 2 x minimumFee, but stucks to 10 or a number that it takes from an unknown place.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: